Literature DB >> 12738335

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results.

Qiuwen Wu1, Radhe Mohan, Monica Morris, Andrew Lauve, Rupert Schmidt-Ullrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This report describes the dosimetric analyses of a Phase I/II protocol, designed to examine the capabilities of an institutionally developed intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) system with respect to dose escalation. The protocol employed stringent dosimetric guidelines in the treatment of locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) with radiotherapy alone using IMRT and the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first 14 patients enrolled on the protocol were included in this analysis. Escalating doses of 68.1 Gy (6 patients), 70.8 Gy (6 patients), and 73.8 Gy (2 patients) were delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV) in 30 fractions. Simultaneously, constant dose coverage was given to the subclinical disease and the electively treated nodal regions, which received 60 Gy and 54 Gy, respectively, in all three cohorts. Parotid glands were spared to the degree possible without compromising target coverage. The following indices are reported for the GTV: (1) dose to specified percent volumes (e.g., D(98) and D(2)); (2) homogeneity index defined as the ratio (D(2) - D(98))/D(prescription); (3) biologically equivalent uniform dose (EUD); and (4) an index of conformality, PITV, defined as the ratio of volume enclosed within the prescribed isodose surface to the target volume. Treatments were planned and delivered with nine 6-MV photon beams using the multileaf collimator (MLC) "sliding window" technique.
RESULTS: Mean doses to 98% of GTV were 68.4 Gy, 70.5 Gy, and 70.8 Gy, and average GTV dose homogeneity was 6.7%, 7.6%, and 8.8% for the three cohorts. The average doses to the parotid gland proximal to and distant from GTV were 41.3 Gy and 25.7 Gy, respectively. Dose distributions measured in phantom showed good agreement with calculations.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of locally advanced HNSCC using SIB-IMRT as described is feasible. Treatment planning and delivery are safer and more efficient than with conventional three-dimensional processes. Predicted dose distributions can be accurately delivered with excellent conformality using dynamic MLC. At least one of the parotid glands can be adequately spared. Patient follow-up continues and will allow eventual quantitative correlation of delivered dose distributions with clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738335     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04617-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  83 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of the field-in-field technique and tangential wedged beams for breast irradiation.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Aydan Sonmez; Gungor Arslan; Ezgi Oymak; Ayse Kotek; Esma Efe; Serhat Sonmez; Yemliha Dolek
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Reduction of dosimetric impact of intrafractional prostate motion during helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  V Prokic; H Geinitz; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tülay Ercan; Sefik Iğdem; Gül Alço; Funda Zengin; Selin Atilla; Maktav Dinçer; Sait Okkan
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Effective method to reduce the normal brain dose in single-isocenter hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Jialu Lai; Jia Liu; Jianling Zhao; An Li; Shoupeng Liu; Zhonghua Deng; Qiaoyue Tan; Haitao Wang; Yuming Jia; Kaijian Lei; Lin Zhou
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; F A Lerma; Y Wu; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Dirk Verellen; Lien Van De Voorde; Bie de Ost; Geert De Kerf; Olivier Vanderveken; Carl Van Laer; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

8.  New possibilities for volumetric-modulated arc therapy using the Agility™ 160-leaf multileaf collimator.

Authors:  Nadine Blümer; Christian Scherf; Janett Köhn; Eugen Kara; Britta Loutfi-Krauß; Detlef Imhoff; Claus Rödel; Ulla Ramm; Jörg Licher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Intensity-modulated extended-field chemoradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a dose-escalation study.

Authors:  Gabriella Macchia; Savino Cilla; Francesco Deodato; Francesco Legge; Aida Di Stefano; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti; Gabriella Ferrandina
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A Kindler syndrome-associated squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ademar Caldeira; William Correia Trinca; Thais Pires Flores; Andrea Barleze Costa; Claudio de Sá Brito; Karen Loureiro Weigert; Maryana Schwartzhaupt Matos; Carmela Nicolini; Fernando Mariano Obst
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.