OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' attitudes and practices related to depression screening. METHOD: A total of 282 obstetrician-gynecologists completed a 36-question mail survey that assessed attitudes regarding depression screening, training to treat depression, psychosocial concern, professional influence, and ease of screening. RESULT: Depression screening (employed regardless of signs or symptoms) was reported by 44% of physicians. Positive attitudes toward depression screening, high psychosocial concern, high ease of screening, and adequate training to treat depression were significant independent predictors of depression screening practices. CONCLUSION: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists are concerned about depression, believe depression screening is effective, and perform some degree of depression screening with their patients. However, they perceive depression screening as difficult to carry out in everyday practice, and some question whether screening improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' attitudes and practices related to depression screening. METHOD: A total of 282 obstetrician-gynecologists completed a 36-question mail survey that assessed attitudes regarding depression screening, training to treat depression, psychosocial concern, professional influence, and ease of screening. RESULT: Depression screening (employed regardless of signs or symptoms) was reported by 44% of physicians. Positive attitudes toward depression screening, high psychosocial concern, high ease of screening, and adequate training to treat depression were significant independent predictors of depression screening practices. CONCLUSION: The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists are concerned about depression, believe depression screening is effective, and perform some degree of depression screening with their patients. However, they perceive depression screening as difficult to carry out in everyday practice, and some question whether screening improves outcomes.
Authors: Anna LaRocco-Cockburn; Susan D Reed; Jennifer Melville; Carmen Croicu; Joan E Russo; Michal Inspektor; Eddie Edmondson; Wayne Katon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Tiffany A Moore Simas; Michael P Flynn; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Stephanie M Carvalho; Leonard L Levin; Kathleen Biebel; Nancy Byatt Journal: Clin Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.190
Authors: Mary J Baker-Ericzén; Cynthia D Connelly; Andrea L Hazen; Cecilia Dueñas; John A Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Liisa Hantsoo; Stephanie Criniti; Annum Khan; Marian Moseley; Naomi Kincler; Laura J Faherty; C Neill Epperson; Ian M Bennett Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Jeffrey M Fowler; Kristen M Carpenter; Parul Gupta; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Barbara L Andersen Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Dwenda Gjerdingen; Scott Crow; Patricia McGovern; Michael Miner; Bruce Center Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657