Lubna Pal1, Vinita Parkash, J T Chambers. 1. Department of Gynecology, Yale University & School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. lubnapal@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-associated blood eosinophilia and tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia have been described in association with a spectrum of neoplasms. A case of uterine leiomyosarcoma exhibiting both blood and tissue eosinophilia is presented. CASE: A 67-year-old postmenopausal woman was evaluated for a 6-month history of postmenopausal bleeding. An office-based endometrial biopsy yielded atypical mesenchymal tissue with marked eosinophilic infiltrate suspicious for a uterine sarcoma, and the patient was referred to the gynecologic oncology service in a tertiary care hospital. There was evidence of leukocytosis and eosinophilia in preoperative laboratory assessment. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection. Histopathology confirmed a low-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma confined to the uterus. There was extensive infiltration of the tumor with eosinophils. The systemic leukocytosis and the absolute eosinophilia responded to surgical removal of the tumor, with normalization of values in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: A differential diagnosis of malignancy should be entertained during an evaluation of systemic eosinophilia.
BACKGROUND:Tumor-associated blood eosinophilia and tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia have been described in association with a spectrum of neoplasms. A case of uterine leiomyosarcoma exhibiting both blood and tissue eosinophilia is presented. CASE: A 67-year-old postmenopausal woman was evaluated for a 6-month history of postmenopausal bleeding. An office-based endometrial biopsy yielded atypical mesenchymal tissue with marked eosinophilic infiltrate suspicious for a uterine sarcoma, and the patient was referred to the gynecologic oncology service in a tertiary care hospital. There was evidence of leukocytosis and eosinophilia in preoperative laboratory assessment. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection. Histopathology confirmed a low-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma confined to the uterus. There was extensive infiltration of the tumor with eosinophils. The systemic leukocytosis and the absolute eosinophilia responded to surgical removal of the tumor, with normalization of values in the immediate postoperative period. CONCLUSION: A differential diagnosis of malignancy should be entertained during an evaluation of systemic eosinophilia.
Authors: Seungkoo Lee; Gail Domecq C Tanawit; Rolando A Lopez; Jaime T Zamuco; Betsy Grace G Cheng; Menandro V Siozon Journal: Korean J Pathol Date: 2014-12-31