Literature DB >> 12738049

Auditory event-related potentials in 50 melancholic patients: increased N100, N200 and P300 latencies and diminished P300 amplitude.

M Urretavizcaya1, I Moreno, L Benlloch, N Cardoner, J Serrallonga, J M Menchón, J Vallejo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether there are some differences in Event-Related Potentials (ERP) between melancholic patients and healthy controls. To establish whether there is a relationship between abnormalities of ERP and severity of depression and psychomotor retardation.
METHOD: Melancholic depressed patients (N=50) and normal comparison subjects (N=31) were assessed for latencies and interlatencies of N100, N200, N400, latency and amplitude of P300. The ERPs were studied with an 'oddball paradigm' in the auditory modality. Severity of depression was measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and psychomotor retardation with the Depressive Retardation Rating Scale (DRRS).
RESULTS: The melancholic group showed a significantly higher latency in N100 (P<0.001), N200 (P<0.001) and P300 (P<0.001) and a significantly lower P300 amplitude (P<0.001) than healthy controls. No other differences were found either in the latencies of the N400 or in their interlatencies. HDRS and DRRS do not have any significant correlations with amplitude or latency measures. LIMITATIONS: The subjects of this study are inpatients, with a severe subcategory of depression and high average age. It is difficult to generalize these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The principal finding of this study is the increase in three of the four latencies measured (N100, N200 and P300) and in the decreased P300 amplitude in melancholic patients compared to normal controls. There is no association between these abnormalities and clinical variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738049     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00016-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  14 in total

Review 1.  Olfaction as a marker for depression.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Overnight changes in waking auditory evoked potential amplitude reflect altered sleep homeostasis in major depression.

Authors:  M R Goldstein; D T Plante; B K Hulse; S Sarasso; E C Landsness; G Tononi; R M Benca
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 6.392

3.  Blunted Flanker P300 Demonstrates Specificity to Depressive Symptoms in Females during Adolescence.

Authors:  Nicholas J Santopetro; Alexander M Kallen; Austin Hunter Threadgill; Nader Amir; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2021-10-06

4.  Possible association of the GSK3β gene with the anxiety symptoms of major depressive disorder and P300 waveform.

Authors:  Sha Liu; Ning Sun; Yong Xu; Chunxia Yang; Yan Ren; Zhifen Liu; Xiaohua Cao; Yan Sun; Qi Xu; Kerang Zhang; Yan Shen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-10-02

5.  Reduced brain responses to novel sounds in depression: P3 findings in a novelty oddball task.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; Christopher J Kroppmann; Jürgen Kayser; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Dysfunction in early auditory processing in major depressive disorder revealed by combined MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Hidehisa Yamashita; Heikki Rytsälä; Kirsi Suominen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Erkki Isometsä
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  ERP evidence of impaired central nervous system function in virally suppressed HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Linda L Chao; Joselyn A Lindgren; Derek L Flenniken; Michael W Weiner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Fronto-temporal alterations within the first 200 ms during an attentional task distinguish major depression, non-clinical participants with depressed mood and healthy controls: a potential biomarker?

Authors:  Andrew H Kemp; Patrick J Hopkinson; Daniel F Hermens; Donald L Rowe; Alexander L Sumich; C Richard Clark; Wilhelmus Drinkenburg; Nadia Abdi; Rebecca Penrose; Alexander McFarlane; Philip Boyce; Evian Gordon; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The relationship between somatic and cognitive-affective depression symptoms and error-related ERPs.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Vaughn R Steele; J Michael Maurer; Kent A Kiehl; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  A review of electroencephalographic changes in diabetes mellitus in relation to major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Anusha Baskaran; Roumen Milev; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.