Literature DB >> 1273761

Quality assurance: the cost of utilization review and the educational value of medical audit in a university hospital.

C K McSherry.   

Abstract

The components of mandated quality assurance, that is, utilization review (UR) and medical audit, have been analyzed to determine their cost-effectiveness and educational value in a university hospital. At Ths in 1975 were $205,272--$6.71 per admission or $0.69 per patient day. The average costs per admission and per patient day in teaching hospitals in the New York area in 1975 were $10.42 and $0.93, respectively. It is anticipated that these costs will increase markedly in 1976 because of admission review. Since 1972 approximately 9,500 hospital charts have been reviewed annually to identify an average of six patients per year who required the intervention of the UR committee because of unnecessarily prolonged length of stay. The cost of identifying each patient was $33, 212. In the university hospital, the active participation of the graduate (house) staff in patient care renders the requirements for certification/recertification of the need for hospital services or admission review superfluous. From September, 1973, through December, 1975, 15 studies of evaluation of medical care (medical audit) have been completed at an average cost of $4,788 per audit. In ten audits the principal criticism was inadequate documentation of data in the hospital record. Nine audits were critical of excessive use of laboratory services and deviations of practice were identified in seven audits. Medical audit has failed to achieve its objective to identify the educational needs of the hospital staff. It is suggested that a more satisfactory and less costly form of medical audit should be devised. Clinical studies, published in scientific journals, should be considered in the context of medical audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1273761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Patient care audits not cost effective.

Authors:  T E Wynn
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1979-05

2.  Quality assurance and audit: lessons from North America.

Authors:  M H Liang; P Fortin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  A monumental squeak.

Authors:  A D Silk
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1978-01

4.  Audit again.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

5.  Problem-oriented v. disease-oriented audits.

Authors:  M Zahir
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-02-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  British Medical Association: Royal Commission on the National Health Service. Report of Council to the Special Representative Meeting, London, 9 March 1977.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-01-29

7.  Aspects of audit. 4: Acceptability of audit.

Authors:  C D Shaw
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-06-14

8.  Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital.

Authors:  T D Bunker; C E Ackroyd; H E Griffiths
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The dynamics of utilization review: a case study of 44 Massachusetts hospitals.

Authors:  P M Gertman; R E Egdahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Letter from...Brisbane. Con-men and bother boys.

Authors:  D Meyers
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.