Literature DB >> 12736773

Failure strength of bioabsorbable interference screws: effects of in vivo degradation for 12 weeks.

Onder Kilicoglu1, Mehmet Demirhan, Senol Akman, Ata Can Atalar, Serhat Ozsoy, Umit Ince.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of in vivo degradation for 6-12 weeks on the fixation strength of polylactide bioabsorbable interference screws. Ten bioabsorbable interference screws were used to fix the patellar tendon autograft in ten live sheep knees, which were equally divided into two groups and killed in the 6th or 12th week. The control group consisted of four cadaveric knees. Following the killing of the animals the screws were retrieved and reused to fix patellar tendon grafts in cadaveric sheep knees. Tendon pull-out tests were performed for the partially degraded screws, for the control group, and for the reused screws of the control group. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations of the 6- and 12-week specimens were performed. Tendons pulled-out with an average force of 357+/-30 N in the cadaveric control group on the first use and with 465+/-118 N on the second use. The partially degraded screws failed with a mean load of 399+/-119 N in the 6-week group, and 12-week screws at 447+/-72 N. No macroscopic sign of degradation was observed on the retrieved screws. Histological examination of the 6 week specimens showed necrotic changes in the tendon around screw contact areas. Healing with granulation tissue was present in the same area in the 12th week. Foreign body reaction or an excessive inflammatory reaction was not observed. In vivo degradation of poly- l-lactide interference screws for 12 weeks thus causes neither a loss in the fixation strength of the screws nor an obvious inflammatory reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736773     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Absorbable and metal interference screws: comparison of graft security during healing.

Authors:  M Walton
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; A C Stähelin; H J Helling; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Tibial and pretibial cyst formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.

Authors:  V Martinek; N F Friederich
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Metal and biodegradable interference screws: comparison of failure strength.

Authors:  L L Johnson; G E vanDyk
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Initial fixation strength of polylactic acid interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Abate; P D Fadale; M J Hulstyn; W R Walsh
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Fixation strength of a biodegradable interference screw and a press-fit technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a BPTB graft.

Authors:  S Rupp; P W Krauss; E W Fritsch
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Bioresorbable implants: applications in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  R D Blasier; R Bucholz; W Cole; L L Johnson; E A Mäkelä
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1997

8.  A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M Kurosaka; S Yoshiya; J T Andrish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Positional stability of polylactide pins with various surface textures in sheep tibia.

Authors:  P Mainil-Varlet; J Cordey; S Gogolewski
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-03-05

10.  Clinical degradation and biocompatibility of different bioabsorbable interference screws: a report of six cases.

Authors:  A C Stähelin; A Weiler; H Rüfenacht; R Hoffmann; A Geissmann; R Feinstein
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Shane Nho; Anthony Romeo; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bioabsorbable implants in forefoot surgery: a review of materials, possibilities and disadvantages.

Authors:  Lorenz Pisecky; Matthias Luger; Antonio Klasan; Tobias Gotterbarm; Matthias C Klotz; Rainer Hochgatterer
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Stefano Petrillo; Mattia Loppini; Vincenzo Candela; Giacomo Rizzello; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.