Literature DB >> 12736131

Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning.

D. E. Young1, R. A. Schmidt.   

Abstract

Although the study of feedback about goal achievement (knowledge of results, KR) has been important for the development principles of augmented information feedback in simple skills, there is reason to question the generalizability of these findings to many common learning situations. A more appropriate type of information for skill learning appears to be augmented kinematic (or kinetic) feedback regarding the movement pattern. The experiments presented here extend recent findings about KR to a paradigm involving kinematic feedback. In Experiment 1, we examined how several kinds of temporal and spatial kinematic information supplement KR in learning. Spatial kinematic variables were more effective than temporal variables, as indicated by performance in a retention test without kinematic feedback. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the schedule of augmented kinematic feedback in a method that paralleled previous KR work. We contrasted averaged schedules of augmented feedback, in which information was given either after every trial or as averaged information after every set of five trials. On retention tests without kinematic feedback given 1 day and 1 week after acquisition, averaged schedules led to enhanced performance over an every-trial format. Together, these results begin to define the variables important in kinematic feedback, and suggest that this feedback may influence learning in ways parallel to KR.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 12736131     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1992.9941621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  11 in total

1.  Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review.

Authors:  G Wulf; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Theoretically-driven approaches to motor learning.

Authors:  L Piron; E Bricolo; P Tonin; M Dam
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-10

3.  The effect of feedback schedule manipulation on speech priming patterns and reaction time.

Authors:  Dana Slocomb; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09-12

4.  Effects of implicit visual feedback distortion on human gait.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Kim; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Investigation of Feedback Schedules on Speech Motor Learning in Older Adults.

Authors:  Phil Weir-Mayta; Kristie A Spencer; Steven M Bierer; Ayoub Daliri; Peter Ondish; Ashley France; Erika Hutchison; Caitlin Sears
Journal:  Int J Aging Res       Date:  2019

6.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Effect of explicit visual feedback distortion on human gait.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Kim; Dieudonne Mugisha
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Bidirectional and multi-user telerehabilitation system: clinical effect on balance, functional activity, and satisfaction in patients with chronic stroke living in long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Kwan-Hwa Lin; Chin-Hsing Chen; You-Yin Chen; Wen-Tzeng Huang; Jin-Shin Lai; Shang-Ming Yu; Yuan-Jen Chang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Comparing the Effects of Self-Controlled and Examiner-Controlled Feedback on Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Mohamad Hosein Zamani; Rouholah Fatemi; Keyvan Soroushmoghadam
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci       Date:  2015-12-23

10.  Walking Speed Influences the Effects of Implicit Visual Feedback Distortion on Modulation of Gait Symmetry.

Authors:  Gabrielle Maestas; Jiyao Hu; Jessica Trevino; Pranathi Chunduru; Seung-Jae Kim; Hyunglae Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.