Literature DB >> 12736020

Evaluation of complications and results in a contemporary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies with the anatomic approach at a single institution.

Massimo Maffezzini1, Mauro Seveso, Gianluigi Taverna, Guido Giusti, Alessio Benetti, Pierpaolo Graziotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the complications and results of radical retropubic prostatectomy with the anatomic approach, at our center, to allow a comparison with published studies and precise patient counseling.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts and records of the follow-up visits of all patients who consecutively underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically intracapsular prostate cancer between March 1997 and February 2002.
RESULTS: The pathologic stage was pT0 in 4 patients (1.3%), pT2a in 83 (27.7%), pT2b in 116 (38.7%), pT3a in 52 (17.3%), pT3b in 38 (12.6%), and pT4 in the remaining 7 (2.4%). Extracapsular disease extension was present in 97 specimens (32.3%); it was associated with positive margins in 64 patients (21.3%). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded in 19 patients (6.3%). Immediate surgical repair was necessary in 3 cases (1%) and delayed in 5 (1.7%). A stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis was observed in 2 patients (0.7%). At a median follow-up of 29 months (range 6 to 57), a total of 262 patients (88.8%) was continent; 26 patients (8.8%) had stress incontinence, and 7 were incontinent (2.3%). Of 262 patients, 128 (48.2%) achieved continence within the first day of catheter removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy is associated with low complication rates; with the anatomic approach, a limited incidence of incontinence is attainable, consistent with major referral centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736020     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02517-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Seperation of dorsal vein complex from the urethra by blunt finger dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ali Atan; Altuğ Tuncel; Fazlı Polat; Melih Balcı; Süleyman Yeşil; Ersin Köseoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Detrusor underactivity is prevalent after radical prostatectomy: A urodynamic study including risk factors.

Authors:  Doreen E Chung; Benjamin Dillon; Jordan Kurta; Alexandra Maschino; Angel Cronin; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Jean F Wyman; Ryan Ping; Timothy J Wilt; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

6.  Complications and functional results of surgery for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S G Joniau; A A Van Baelen; C Y Hsu; H P Van Poppel
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.