Literature DB >> 12734785

The effect of progesterone and synthetic progestins on serum- and estradiol-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells.

H Seeger1, D Wallwiener, A O Mueck.   

Abstract

The results from the Women's Health Initiative study on enhanced breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women using an estrogen/progestin combination clearly indicate the need for a comparison of different progestins with regard to cancer risk. To shed some light on this issue, we have investigated the influence of progesterone and various synthetic C19- and C21-progestins on cell proliferation of a human breast cancer cell line in vitro. Of special interested was the comparison of two different regimens commonly used in HRT, sequential and continuous combination with estradiol. We used the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 as a model. Progesterone (P), chlormadinone acetate (CMA), dienogest (DNG), gestodene (GSD), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and norethisterone (NET) were investigated in the range of 0.01nm to 10 micro M alone and in combination with 10 nM estradiol. Cell proliferation was measured after 7 days using the ATP chemosensitivity test. Tested alone, CMA, DNG, GSD, KDG, MPA and NET significantly stimulated cell proliferation, but only at high dosages. Sequentially combined with estradiol, only CMA inhibited cell proliferation over the whole concentration range. Slight effects were found for DNG, GSD and KDG, whereas P and MPA only showed an effect at the highest concentration. NET had no significant effect on cell proliferation. Continuously combined, all progestins exhibited an inhibitory effect over the whole concentration range. The most prominent effects were found for P, CMA, GSD, and KDG. Only slight effects were found for DNG, MPA and NET. Our in vitro results indicate that the influence on breast cancer risk using HRT in postmenopausal women might depend on the type of progestin used as well as on the regimen applied. However, the net inhibitory in vitro effect of the progestins at clinically relevant dosages is rather minimal, and whether progestins in general can reduce breast cancer risk in long-term treatment remains uncertain. Further clinical trials are urgently needed to clarify this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12734785     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Metab Res        ISSN: 0018-5043            Impact factor:   2.936


  10 in total

Review 1.  Changing concepts: Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Garnet L Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  In vivo and in vitro estrogenic and progestagenic actions of Tibolone.

Authors:  Anil Sadarangani; Ana María Salgado; Sumie Kato; Mauricio Pinto; Andrés Carvajal; Carolina Monso; Gareth I Owen; Pilar Vigil
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.612

3.  Progesterone in Peri- and Postmenopause: A Review.

Authors:  P-A Regidor
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Progesterone effects on cell growth of U373 and D54 human astrocytoma cell lines.

Authors:  Gabriela González-Agüero; Andrés A Gutiérrez; Diana González-Espinosa; José D Solano; Rocío Morales; Aliesha González-Arenas; Edith Cabrera-Muñoz; Ignacio Camacho-Arroyo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate differentially regulate alpha4 subunit expression of GABA(A) receptors in the CA1 hippocampus of female rats.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Katharine V Northcutt; Heather B Patisaul; Kim Wallen; Mark E Wilson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-02-07

6.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate antagonizes the effects of estrogen treatment on social and sexual behavior in female macaques.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Mark E Wilson; Kim Wallen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Progesterone suppresses the invasion and migration of breast cancer cells irrespective of their progesterone receptor status - a short report.

Authors:  Mukul Godbole; Kanishka Tiwary; Rajendra Badwe; Sudeep Gupta; Amit Dutt
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  miR-129-2 mediates down-regulation of progesterone receptor in response to progesterone in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mukul Godbole; Pratik Chandrani; Nilesh Gardi; Hemant Dhamne; Kuldeep Patel; Neelima Yadav; Sudeep Gupta; Rajendra Badwe; Amit Dutt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  CCM signaling complex (CSC) couples both classic and non-classic Progesterone receptor signaling.

Authors:  Johnathan Abou-Fadel; Xiaoting Jiang; Brian Grajeda; Akhil Padarti; Cameron C Ellis; Esmeralda Flores; Alyssa-Marie D Cailing-De La O; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 7.525

10.  Polymorphisms of Phase I and Phase II Enzymes and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Christina Justenhoven
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.