Literature DB >> 12734502

Confocal histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis in vivo and the impact of skin color (black vs white).

Shari P Hicks1, Kirsty J Swindells, Maritza A Middelkamp-Hup, Martine A Sifakis, Ernesto González, Salvador González.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of irritant contact dermatitis and its modulation according to skin color is not well understood. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) enables high-resolution, real-time, in-vivo imaging of human skin.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to use RCM to determine whether susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis differs between black and white skin.
METHODS: Participants were placed in groups on the basis of skin color and the volar aspects of their forearms exposed to 1% and 4% sodium lauryl sulfate using Finn Chambers (Allerderm Laboratories Inc, Petaluma, Calif). They were evaluated at 6, 24, and 48 hours by RCM, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler velocimetry, and routine histology.
RESULTS: Participants with white skin had more severe clinical reactions than those with black skin. RCM revealed microscopic changes even without clinical evidence of irritation. Confocal features included parakeratosis, spongiosis, perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, and microvesicle formation, and these features were confirmed by routine histology. Also, participants with white skin had greater mean increases in transepidermal water loss after exposure to 4% sodium lauryl sulfate than did participants with black skin.
CONCLUSION: In-vivo RCM can track early pathophysiologic events revealing differences between black and white skin during the development of irritant contact dermatitis, and may support the theory that those with black skin are more resistant to irritants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12734502     DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  7 in total

1.  Non infective bullous lesions: a diagnostic challenge in a minimally equipped centre- based solely on microscopic findings.

Authors:  Rashi Garg; Kaushal Bhojani
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 2.  Optical techniques for the noninvasive diagnosis of skin cancer.

Authors:  Mihaela Antonina Calin; Sorin Viorel Parasca; Roxana Savastru; Marian Romeo Calin; Simona Dontu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Real-Time Reflectance Confocal Microscopy of Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease Correlates with Histopathology.

Authors:  Rachel E Reingold; Jilliana Monnier; Marco Ardigò; Joseph R Stoll; Maria C Pena; Japbani K Nanda; Stephen W Dusza; Josel D Ruiz; Lisa Flynn; Antara Afrin; Elizabeth G Klein; Susan E Prockop; Melissa P Pulitzer; Doris M Ponce; Alina Markova; Manu Jain
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  High-definition optical coherence tomography: adapted algorithmic method for pattern analysis of inflammatory skin diseases: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marc Boone; Sarah Norrenberg; Gregor Jemec; Véronique Del Marmol
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 5.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in dermatology.

Authors:  Anca L Branzan; Michael Landthaler; Rolf-Markus Szeimies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.555

6.  Skin Biophysical Parameters and Patch Test Results in People Predisposing to Xiaotong Tiegao Induced Irritant Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Cheng; Lin-Feng Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 7.  Neurosurgical confocal endomicroscopy: A review of contrast agents, confocal systems, and future imaging modalities.

Authors:  Aqib H Zehri; Wyatt Ramey; Joseph F Georges; Michael A Mooney; Nikolay L Martirosyan; Mark C Preul; Peter Nakaji
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.