Literature DB >> 12734135

Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer.

Ellen P McCarthy1, Risa B Burns, Quyen Ngo-Metzger, Roger B Davis, Russell S Phillips.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: For most patients aged 65 years or older with cancer, hospice services are uniformly covered by Medicare. Hospice care is believed to improve care for patients at the end of life. However, few patients use hospice and others enroll too late to maximize the benefits of hospice services.
OBJECTIVES: Because type of insurance may affect use, we examined whether patients with Medicare managed care insurance enrolled in hospice earlier and had longer hospice stays than patients with Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) insurance. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of the last year of life using the Linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database in 1 of 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program coverage areas. PATIENTS: A total of 260 090 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older diagnosed with first primary lung (n = 62 117), colorectal (n = 57 260), prostate (n = 59 826), female breast (n = 37 609), bladder (n = 19 598), pancreatic (n = 11 378), gastric (n = 9599), or liver (n = 2703) cancer between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 1996, and who died between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from diagnosis to hospice entry and hospice length of stay for patients enrolled in FFS vs managed care plans after adjusting for patient demographics, tumor registry, year of hospice entry, and type and cancer stage.
RESULTS: Of the 260 090 patients, most were men (59%), white (85%), and enrolled in FFS (89.7%). Only 54 937 patients (21.1%) received hospice care before death. Hospice use varied by type of primary cancer ranging from 31.8% of patients with pancreatic cancer to 15.6% with bladder cancer. Managed care patients were more likely to use hospice than FFS patients (32.4% vs 19.8%, P<.001). Among hospice patients, median (interquartile range) length of stay was longer for managed care vs FFS patients (32 days [11-82] vs 25 days [9-66], P<.001). After adjustment, managed care patients had higher rates of hospice enrollment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.42) and had a longer length of stay (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94) vs FFS patients. Managed care patients were less likely to enroll in hospice within 7 days of their death (18.6% vs 22.6%, P<.001) and somewhat more likely to enroll in hospice more than 180 days before death (7.8% vs 6.1%, P<.001); the results for each of the 8 cancer diagnoses were similar. Hospice enrollment and length of stay among managed care vs FFS patients differed significantly by region.
CONCLUSION: Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in managed care had consistently higher rates of hospice use and significantly longer hospice stays than those enrolled in FFS. Although these differences may reflect patient and family preferences, our findings raise the possibility that some managed care plans are more successful at facilitating or encouraging hospice use for patients dying with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12734135     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  52 in total

1.  Half of older Americans seen in emergency department in last month of life; most admitted to hospital, and many die there.

Authors:  Alexander K Smith; Ellen McCarthy; Ellen Weber; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; John Boscardin; Jonathan Fisher; Kenneth Covinsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Minjung Lee; Bryce B Reeve; Angela B Mariotto; Zhuoqiao Wang; Ron D Hays; K Robin Yabroff; Marie Topor; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Health care costs during the last 12 months of life in Israel: estimation and implications for risk-adjustment.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli; David Messika; Irit Zmora; Bernice Oberman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2010-05-22

4.  End-of-life care in Medicare beneficiaries dying with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Casey A Boyd; Jamie Benarroch-Gampel; Yong-Fang Kuo; Catherine D Cooksley; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Hospice Utilization in Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Elie K Mehanna; Paul J Catalano; Daniel N Cagney; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Brian M Alexander; James A Tulsky; Ayal A Aizer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Identifying population groups with low palliative care program enrolment using classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Jun Gao; Grace M Johnston; M Ruth Lavergne; Paul McIntyre
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.250

7.  The dartmouth atlas applied to kaiser permanente: analysis of variation in care at the end of life.

Authors:  Matt Stiefel; Paul Feigenbaum; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

8.  Hospice care and survival among elderly patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Akiko M Saito; Mary Beth Landrum; Bridget A Neville; John Z Ayanian; Jane C Weeks; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Advanced imaging and hospice use in end-of-life cancer care.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Lesley H Curtis; Soko Setoguchi; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Social Inequalities in Palliative Care for Cancer Patients in the United States: A Structured Review.

Authors:  Ronit Elk; Tisha M Felder; Ebru Cayir; Cleo A Samuel
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.