Literature DB >> 12734090

Sentinel lymph node mapping for thick (>or=4-mm) melanoma: should we be doing it?

Grant W Carlson1, Douglas R Murray, Andrea Hestley, Charles A Staley, Robert H Lyles, Cynthia Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thick (>or=4-mm) primary melanomas are believed to be associated with a high incidence of occult distant metastases. The use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy in the treatment lesions has been questioned.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a computerized database identified 114 patients who underwent successful SLN mapping and biopsy from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1999. Records were reviewed for clinicopathologic features of the patients and their tumors. Survival curves were constructed from Kaplan-Meier estimates and analyzed with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling.
RESULTS: There were 75 men and 39 women with a mean age of 57 years (range, 24-85 years). The primary tumor sites were head and neck (n = 29; 25.4%), trunk (n = 44; 38.6%), and extremities (n = 41; 36%). Tumor thickness ranged from 4 to 17 mm (median, 5.2 mm; mean, 6.3 mm). Ulceration was present in 40 (35.1%) tumors. Thirty-seven patients (32.5%) had a positive SLN biopsy, and 18 of these patients (48.6%) had a single tumor-positive lymph node after dissection. The mean follow-up was 37.8 months. The overall 3-year survival for SLN-negative patients was 82%, versus 57% for SLN-positive patients (P =.006). Lymph node status and tumor ulceration were independent predictors of overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The pathologic status of the SLN in patients with thick melanomas is a strong independent prognostic factor for survival, and SLN mapping should be routinely performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12734090     DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.03.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients.

Authors:  Charles R Scoggins; Merrick I Ross; Douglas S Reintgen; R Dirk Noyes; James S Goydos; Peter D Beitsch; Marshall M Urist; Stephan Ariyan; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Anees B Chagpar; Robert C G Martin; Arnold J Stromberg; Lee Hagendoorn; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Charles M Balch; Patricia Hurley; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Timothy J Akhurst; Alistair Cochran; Janice N Cormier; Mark Gorman; Theodore Y Kim; Kelly M McMasters; R Dirk Noyes; Lynn M Schuchter; Matias E Valsecchi; Donald L Weaver; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Management of regional lymph node basins in melanoma.

Authors:  Timothy P Love; Keith A Delman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

4.  Sentinel lymph node status as most important prognostic factor in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanomas (tumour thickness >4.00 mm): outcome analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Hoeller; Joerg Wenzel; Hans-J Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Thin Melanoma with Nodal Involvement: Analysis of Demographic, Pathologic, and Treatment Factors with Regard to Prognosis.

Authors:  Giorgos Karakousis; Phyllis A Gimotty; Edmund K Bartlett; Myung-Shin Sim; Madalyn G Neuwirth; Douglas Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Mark B Faries
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Identification of Patients with Intermediate Thickness Melanoma at Low Risk for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Madalyn G Peters; Anne Blair; Mark S Etherington; David E Elder; Xiaowei G Xu; DuPont Guerry; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Phyllis A Gimotty; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Thick melanoma: prognostic value of positive sentinel nodes.

Authors:  Lenka Vermeeren; Fred W C van der Ent; Prapto S H Sastrowijoto; Karel W E Hulsewé
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma.

Authors:  Farin Amersi; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2007

9.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick primary cutaneous melanoma: patterns of use and underuse utilizing a population-based model.

Authors:  Steve R Martinez; Dhruvil R Shah; Anthony D Yang; Robert J Canter; Emanual Maverakis
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2013-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.