Stephen Cohen1, Lucia Blanco, Louis Berman. 1. University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, Calif. 94115, USA. scohen@newmentor.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection and management of vertical root fractures, or VRFs, remain a vexing issue that has caused needless suffering for patients as well as for dentists. The authors present techniques to aid the dentist in recognizing VRFs. METHODS: During a five-year period, the authors examined 36 patients who had VRFs. Absent control subjects and a larger number of patients, the authors did not design this investigation for statistical analysis. They diagnosed VRFs through dental histories and clinical and radiographic examinations. RESULTS: The study revealed VRFs in 36 teeth, two of which were vital and 34 of which were nonvital (that is, endodontically treated). The 34 VRFs resulted from excessive operative procedures performed in the root canal after endodontic therapy. Thirty-one of these 34 VRFs were caused by poorly designed dowels (too long, too wide or both) or inappropriate selection of the tooth as a bridge abutment; two VRFs were caused by a restoration that exerted lateral pressure on the axial walls of the preparation; and one VRF was caused by overzealous endodontic forces. The VRFs in the two vital teeth were in men who had a history of bruxism or clenching. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: VRFs can be detected early by listening to the patient's chief complaints, carefully examining periapical and bitewing radiographs and performing a thorough clinical examination.
BACKGROUND: Early detection and management of vertical root fractures, or VRFs, remain a vexing issue that has caused needless suffering for patients as well as for dentists. The authors present techniques to aid the dentist in recognizing VRFs. METHODS: During a five-year period, the authors examined 36 patients who had VRFs. Absent control subjects and a larger number of patients, the authors did not design this investigation for statistical analysis. They diagnosed VRFs through dental histories and clinical and radiographic examinations. RESULTS: The study revealed VRFs in 36 teeth, two of which were vital and 34 of which were nonvital (that is, endodontically treated). The 34 VRFs resulted from excessive operative procedures performed in the root canal after endodontic therapy. Thirty-one of these 34 VRFs were caused by poorly designed dowels (too long, too wide or both) or inappropriate selection of the tooth as a bridge abutment; two VRFs were caused by a restoration that exerted lateral pressure on the axial walls of the preparation; and one VRF was caused by overzealous endodontic forces. The VRFs in the two vital teeth were in men who had a history of bruxism or clenching. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: VRFs can be detected early by listening to the patient's chief complaints, carefully examining periapical and bitewing radiographs and performing a thorough clinical examination.
Authors: S J M Jakobson; V P D Westphalen; U X Silva Neto; L F Fariniuk; A G D Schroeder; E Carneiro Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 2.419