Literature DB >> 12732183

The Runx genes as dominant oncogenes.

Ewan R Cameron1, Karen Blyth, Linda Hanlon, Anna Kilbey, Nancy Mackay, Monica Stewart, Anne Terry, Francois Vaillant, Sandy Wotton, James C Neil.   

Abstract

We have shown previously that Runx2 is a frequent target (approximately equal to 30%) for proviral insertion in murine leukemia virus (MLV) induced T cell tumors in CD2-MYC transgenic mice. Further investigation of a large panel of these tumors revealed that a small number also contain insertions at either Runx3 or Runx1. None of the tumors contained insertions at more than one family member, but in each case proviral insertion was associated with a high level of expression from the upstream (P1) promoter of the respective target gene. Moreover, we confirmed that transcriptional activation of Runx1 does not affect the integrity of the coding sequence, as previously observed for Runx2. These observations suggest that the three Runx genes act as functionally redundant oncogenes in T-cell lymphoma development. To explore the oncogenic potential of Runx2 further we created transgenic mice that over-express this gene in the T cell compartment. These CD2-Runx2 animals show a preneoplastic enlargement of the CD8 immature single positive (ISP) thymocyte pool and develop lymphomas at a low incidence. Although the CD8 ISP population is greatly increased, unlike their wild type counterparts these cells are largely non-cycling. Co-expression of c-MYC in this lineage accentuates the CD8 ISP skew and induces rapid tumor development, confirming the potent synergy that exists between these two oncogenes. Experiments designed to understand the nature of the observed synergy are ongoing and are based on the hypothesis that Runx2 may exert a survival effect in c-MYC expressing tumors in vivo while c-MYC may rescue cells from the antiproliferative effects of Runx2. The oncogenic potential of Runx1 is also being assessed using primary murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). These studies have revealed that while Runx1 exerts a growth suppressive effect in wild type cells a growth promoting effect is seen in the absence of p53, suggesting that the Runx genes may harbor latent oncogene-like properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12732183     DOI: 10.1016/s1079-9796(03)00031-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis        ISSN: 1079-9796            Impact factor:   3.039


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Tumor stem cell research - basis and challenge for diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  Heidrun Karlic; Harald Herrmann; Axel Schulenburg; Thomas W Grunt; Sylvia Laffer; Irina Mirkina; Rainer Hubmann; Medhat Shehata; Brigitte Marian; Edgar Selzer; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Elisabeth Pittermann; Ulrich Jäger; Hubert Pehamberger; Christoph Zielinski; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  The RUNX2 cistrome in osteoblasts: characterization, down-regulation following differentiation, and relationship to gene expression.

Authors:  Mark B Meyer; Nancy A Benkusky; J Wesley Pike
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The influence of genetic ancestry and ethnicity on breast cancer survival associated with genetic variation in the TGF-β-signaling pathway: The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Abbie Lundgreen; Marianna C Stern; Lisa Hines; Roger K Wolff; Anna R Giuliano; Kathy B Baumgartner; Esther M John
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Genetic variation in the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway and survival after diagnosis with colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Abbie Lundgreen; Jennifer S Herrick; Roger K Wolff; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  RUNX transcription factors: association with pediatric asthma and modulated by maternal smoking.

Authors:  Kathleen J Haley; Jessica Lasky-Su; Sara E Manoli; Lacey A Smith; Aliakbar Shahsafaei; Scott T Weiss; Kelan Tantisira
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Associations between genetic variation in RUNX1, RUNX2, RUNX3, MAPK1 and eIF4E and riskof colon and rectal cancer: additional support for a TGF-β-signaling pathway.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Abbie Lundgreen; Jennifer S Herrick; Bette J Caan; John D Potter; Roger K Wolff
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Relationship between RUNX1 and AXIN1 in ER-negative versus ER-positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nyam-Osor Chimge; Sara Ahmed-Alnassar; Baruch Frenkel
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Genetic variation in the transforming growth factor-β-signaling pathway, lifestyle factors, and risk of colon or rectal cancer.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Abbie Lundgreen; Roger K Wolff; Jennifer S Herrick; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling.

Authors:  N-O Chimge; B Frenkel
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Overexpression of osteoprotegerin promotes preosteoblast differentiation to mature osteoblasts.

Authors:  Hongyou Yu; Paul de Vos; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.