Literature DB >> 12731811

A social network contagion theory of risk perception.

Clifford W Scherer1, Hichang Cho.   

Abstract

Risk perceptions have, to a great extent, been studied exclusively as individual cognitive mechanisms in which individuals collect, process, and form perceptions as atomized units unconnected to a social system. These individual-level theories do not, however, help explain how perception of risk may vary between communities or within a single community. One alternative approach is based on a network theory of contagion. This approach, emerging largely from organizational and community social network studies, suggests that it is the relational aspects of individuals and the resulting networks and self-organizing systems that influence individual perceptions and build "groups or communities of like-minded" individuals. These social units, it is argued, behave as attitude, knowledge, or behavioral structures. The study reported in this article tests one aspect of this theoretical perspective. The central hypothesis proposes the existence of risk perception networks--relational groupings of individuals who share, and perhaps create, similar risk perceptions. To test this idea, data were collected from individuals involved in a community environmental conflict over a hazardous waste site cleanup. The statistical analysis used a matrix of relational social linkages to compare with a matrix of individual risk perceptions The analysis confirmed the hypothesis suggesting that social linkages in communities may play an important role in focusing risk perceptions.

Year:  2003        PMID: 12731811     DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  36 in total

1.  Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.

Authors:  Malcolm P Cutchin; Kathryn Remmes Martin; Steven V Owen; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Health through the urban lens.

Authors:  Jeremiah A Barondess
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chains.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Henry Brighton; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cross-cultural and site-based influences on demographic, well-being, and social network predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico: predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico.

Authors:  Eric C Jones; Albert J Faas; Arthur D Murphy; Graham A Tobin; Linda M Whiteford; Christopher McCarty
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-03

5.  Social networks and HIV/AIDs risk perceptions.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Kohler; Jere R Behrman; Susan C Watkins
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-02

6.  Correlates of misperception of breast cancer risk among Korean-American Women.

Authors:  Jiyun Kim; Bo Yun Huh; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-11-18

7.  The role of social exposure in predicting weight bias and weight bias internalisation: an international study.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane F Stewart; Jane Ogden
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Risk Perception and Coping Behavior of Construction Workers on Occupational Health Risks-A Case Study of Nanjing, China.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Jie Li; Hongyang Li; He Li; Peng Mao; Jingfeng Yuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Pinelopi Konstantinou; Katerina Georgiou; Navin Kumar; Maria Kyprianidou; Christos Nicolaides; Maria Karekla; Angelos P Kassianos
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-05

10.  The Double Bind of Communicating About Zoonotic Origins: Describing Exotic Animal Sources of COVID-19 Increases Both Healthy and Discriminatory Avoidance Intentions.

Authors:  Mark LaCour; Brent Hughes; Micah Goldwater; Molly Ireland; Darrell Worthy; Jason Van Allen; Nick Gaylord; Garrett Van-Hoosier; Tyler Davis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.