Literature DB >> 12731626

Electromyographic findings in recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation.

Nicole Maronian1, Patricia Waugh, Lawrence Robinson, Allen Hillel.   

Abstract

Abductor, adductor, and combined reinnervation procedures have been explored with variable success rates. We describe the experience of a tertiary care center with adductor reinnervation procedures, including preoperative and postoperative videostroboscopy and electromyography (EMG) findings. A retrospective chart review was performed from 1997 to 2001 that included 9 patients. Preoperative and postoperative voice comparison was performed by 3 blinded speech pathologists. Clinical comparisons of videostroboscopy findings for vocal fold bulk, tone, position, presence of gap, and movement are elucidated. The preoperative and postoperative EMG findings are described. In all patients, preoperative EMG revealed a dense, complete denervation of the affected recurrent laryngeal nerve. No movement was noted on videostroboscopy with persistent glottic gap. Reinnervation involved a nerve-muscle pedicle or a direct neurorrhaphy of the ansa cervicalis to the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Voice improvement was noted between 60 days and 3 months after reinnervation. Four postoperative EMG studies were performed. An early postoperative EMG study at 5 months revealed activation of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle and thyroarytenoid muscle with head-lift. Videostroboscopy showed excellent near-midline static positioning of the vocal fold. Late EMG studies, performed 12 to 16 months after reinnervation, revealed "learning" of these muscles, with new activation on "eee" phonation. We conclude that recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation procedures belong in the armamentarium of the laryngologist for the treatment of vocal fold paralysis. The EMG findings reported in this study suggest that ongoing reinnervation allows for activation with phonation in matured neuronal anastomoses. Overall, this procedure results in excellent patient acceptance and near-normal vocal quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12731626     DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  6 in total

1.  Cross-activation and detraining effects of tongue exercise in aged rats.

Authors:  Allison J Schaser; Michelle R Ciucci; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The role of immediate recurrent laryngeal nerve reconstruction for thyroid cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tetsuji Sanuki; Eiji Yumoto; Ryosei Minoda; Narihiro Kodama
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 4.375

3.  Parameters and Scales Used to Assess and Report Findings From Stroboscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Maude Desjardins; Kendrea L Garand; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Comparison of vocal outcome following two different procedures for immediate RLN reconstruction.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Kumai; Narihiro Kodama; Daizo Murakami; Eiji Yumoto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Reconstructive procedures for impaired upper airway function: laryngeal respiration.

Authors:  Andreas Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

6.  Does laryngeal reinnervation or type I thyroplasty give better voice results for patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (VOCALIST): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Blackshaw; Paul Carding; Marcus Jepson; Marina Mat Baki; Gareth Ambler; Anne Schilder; Stephen Morris; Aneeka Degun; Rosamund Yu; Samantha Husbands; Helen Knowles; Chloe Walton; Yakubu Karagama; Kate Heathcote; Martin Birchall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.