Literature DB >> 12730628

Safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during PCI.

Louis Carnendran1, Robert Borkowski, Bashar Markabawi, Mark F Warner.   

Abstract

The use of intravenous enoxaparin, a glyco-protein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to be safe and to possibly reduce in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events(MACE). NICE-4, a recent PCI observational study, evaluated a reduced dose of intravenous (IV) enoxaparin (0.75 mg/kg) with abciximab. However, prior PCI studies evaluating IV enoxaparin have not used percutaneous closure devices. The purpose of this study was to observe the safety and efficacy of a lower dose of IV enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg) in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The Angio-Seal femoral closure device was also employed as part of the treatment strategy. We administered 0.5 mg/kg IV enoxaparin and a GP IIIb/IIIa inhibitor to 75 eligible PCI patients. None received anticoagulation 24 hours prior to PCI; all received pre-procedural aspirin, post-procedural deployment of the Angio-Seal and clopidogrel therapy, and were discharged home within 36 hours. TIMI minor bleeding was 1.3%; there were no TIMI major bleeding events or major adverse cardiac events during in-hospital stay or at 30-day follow-up. Our small observational study shows that IV enoxaparin is safe and efficacious during PCI when given at a dose 33% lower than previously reported in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and Angio-Seal. However, large, randomized PCI trials are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of lower doses of enoxaparin with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  5 in total

1.  Anti-factor Xa kinetics after intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a population model analysis.

Authors:  Paola Sanchez-Pena; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Saïk Urien; Annick Ankri; Jean-Philippe Collet; Rémi Choussat; Philippe Lechat; Gilles Montalescot
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Relative antithrombotic and antihemostatic effects of protein C activator versus low-molecular-weight heparin in primates.

Authors:  András Gruber; Ulla M Marzec; Leslie Bush; Enrico Di Cera; José A Fernández; Michelle A Berny; Erik I Tucker; Owen J T McCarty; John H Griffin; Stephen R Hanson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The use of a HEMOCHRON JR. HEMONOX point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures.

Authors:  Soumaya El Rouby; Marc Cohen; Andrea Gonzales; Debra Hoppensteadt; Ted Lee; Marcia L Zucker; Khaula Khalid; Frank M Laduca; Jawed Fareed
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  José G Díez; Hector M Medina; Benjamin Y C Cheong; Lawrence O'Meallie; James J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Is the use of unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome outmoded?

Authors:  Elaine Chiquette; Robert Chilton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.113

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.