OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of palpation-guided and high frequency ultrasound-guided needle placement in small joints and to develop a technique to obtain synovial fluid from these joints for diagnosis and research. METHODS: The accuracy of needle placement during palpation-guided proximal interphalangeal (PIP) or metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint injection was assessed. This was compared with the accuracy of ultrasound-guided needle placement. A joint lavage technique was developed to obtain synovial fluid from these joints. RESULTS: Needle positioning was intra-articular in 59% of palpation-guided injections (6/12 PIP and 4/5 MCP joints). No fluid could be aspirated prior to injection. With ultrasound guidance, initial needle placement was intra-articular in 96% of cases (24/26 PIP and 27/27 MCP joints). Synovial fluid cells were lavaged from 63% of joints (19/25 PIP and 14/27 MCP joints). In only one case was a large effusion seen and this was aspirated directly. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high frequency ultrasound to guide needle placement within a small joint allows for significantly greater accuracy than a palpation-guided approach. When followed by lavage, synovial fluid cells and diluted synovial fluid can be obtained from the majority of small joints. This has important clinical and research implications.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of palpation-guided and high frequency ultrasound-guided needle placement in small joints and to develop a technique to obtain synovial fluid from these joints for diagnosis and research. METHODS: The accuracy of needle placement during palpation-guided proximal interphalangeal (PIP) or metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint injection was assessed. This was compared with the accuracy of ultrasound-guided needle placement. A joint lavage technique was developed to obtain synovial fluid from these joints. RESULTS: Needle positioning was intra-articular in 59% of palpation-guided injections (6/12 PIP and 4/5 MCP joints). No fluid could be aspirated prior to injection. With ultrasound guidance, initial needle placement was intra-articular in 96% of cases (24/26 PIP and 27/27 MCP joints). Synovial fluid cells were lavaged from 63% of joints (19/25 PIP and 14/27 MCP joints). In only one case was a large effusion seen and this was aspirated directly. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high frequency ultrasound to guide needle placement within a small joint allows for significantly greater accuracy than a palpation-guided approach. When followed by lavage, synovial fluid cells and diluted synovial fluid can be obtained from the majority of small joints. This has important clinical and research implications.
Authors: Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf; B Lemmerhofer; S Lang; M Schmidt; P T Funovics; P Ziai; S Frenzel; A Kolb; A Graf; C Schueller-Weidekamm Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: H T Draeger; J M Twining; C R Johnson; S C Kettwich; L G Kettwich; A D Bankhurst Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 19.103