Literature DB >> 12729976

Temporal discrimination in a long operant chamber.

Armando Machado1, Richard Keen.   

Abstract

Pigeons were placed in a long chamber equipped with one key and feeder at each end side and one key and houselight at the middle. To obtain food the birds had to choose one side key after a short signal and the other side key after a long signal. The signals consisted of the illumination of the center key and the houselight and were initiated by a peck at the center key. The chamber had sensitive floor panels that enabled us to measure the location of the bird during the signals. In Experiment 1, after the birds learned the discrimination we reversed the assignment of keys to signals. In Experiment 2, we examined performance on two pairs of discriminations holding the same ratio. In Experiment 3, after the pigeons learned to discriminate two signals, we changed the duration of the long signal. The results showed that (a) the birds' motion during the signal was highly stereotypical, i.e. the birds moved to the short side, waited a few seconds, and then departed to, and stayed on the long side; (b) this motion pattern predicted the results of generalization tests with novel durations; (c) the mean of the times of departure from the short side approached its steady state values quicker than the standard deviation and consequently superposition of behavioral measures became stronger with training; (d) only the duration of the short signal influenced significantly the moment the birds departed from the short side; finally (e) the times of arrival at and departure from the short side were positively correlated, but the times of arrival and residence at the short side were negatively correlated.

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729976     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00023-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  12 in total

1.  Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Armando Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Disruptive effects of stimulus intensity on two variations of a temporal discrimination procedure.

Authors:  Erin A McClure; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  D-amphetamine, nicotine, and haloperidol produce similar disruptions in spatial and nonspatial temporal discrimination procedures.

Authors:  Erin A McClure; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Effect of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors on temporal discrimination by mice.

Authors:  Adam L Halberstadt; Ivan S Sindhunata; Kees Scheffers; Aaron D Flynn; Richard F Sharp; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Optimal temporal risk assessment.

Authors:  Fuat Balci; David Freestone; Patrick Simen; Laura Desouza; Jonathan D Cohen; Philip Holmes
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-27

6.  Temporal sensitivity changes with extended training in a bisection task in a transgenic rat model.

Authors:  Bruce L Brown; Sophie Höhn; Alexis Faure; Stephan von Hörsten; Pascale Le Blanc; Nathalie Desvignes; Nicole El Massioui; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28

7.  Ongoing behavior predicts perceptual report of interval duration.

Authors:  Thiago S Gouvêa; Tiago Monteiro; Sofia Soares; Bassam V Atallah; Joseph J Paton
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Duration-specific effects of outcome devaluation in temporal control are differentially sensitive to amount of training.

Authors:  Sho Araiba; Nicole El Massioui; Bruce L Brown; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Striatal dynamics explain duration judgments.

Authors:  Thiago S Gouvêa; Tiago Monteiro; Asma Motiwala; Sofia Soares; Christian Machens; Joseph J Paton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Attentional Mechanisms during the Performance of a Subsecond Timing Task.

Authors:  Anna L Toscano-Zapién; Daniel Velázquez-López; David N Velázquez-Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.