Literature DB >> 12729856

Early microdose drug studies in human volunteers can minimise animal testing: Proceedings of a workshop organised by Volunteers in Research and Testing.

R D Combes1, T Berridge, J Connelly, M D Eve, R C Garner, S Toon, P Wilcox.   

Abstract

Testing the safety and efficacy of a successful human medicine involves many laboratory animals, which can sometimes be subjected to considerable suffering and distress. Also, it is necessary to extrapolate from the test species to humans. UK and European legislation requires that Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal procedures (the Three Rs) are implemented wherever possible. Over the last decade, there has been substantial progress with applying in vitro and in silico methods to both drug efficacy and safety testing. This paper is a report of the discussions and recommendations arising from a workshop on the role that might be played by human volunteer studies in the very early stages of drug development. The workshop was organised in November, 2001 by Volunteers in Research and Testing, a group of individuals in the UK which launched an initiative in 1994 to identify where and how human volunteers can participate safely in biomedical studies to replace laboratory animals. It was considered that conducting pre-Phase I very low dose human studies (sub-toxic and below the dose threshold for measurable pharmacological or clinical activity) could enable drug candidates to be assessed earlier for in vivo human pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Moreover, accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) are potentially useful spectrometric and imaging methods that can be used in conjunction with such human studies. Some, limited animal tests would still be required before pre-Phase I microdose studies, to take account of the potential risk posed by completely novel chemicals. The workshop recommended that very early volunteer studies using microdoses should be introduced into the drug development process in a way that does not compromise volunteer safety or the scientific quality of the resulting safety data. This should improve the selection of drug candidates and also reduce the likelihood of later candidate failure, by providing in vivo human ADME data, especially for pharmacokinetics and metabolism, at an earlier stage in drug development than is currently the case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729856     DOI: 10.1016/s0928-0987(03)00040-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accelerator mass spectrometry-enabled studies: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Ali Arjomand
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Graeme Young; Wooin Lee; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Oliver Langer; Malcolm Rowland; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Prediction of nonlinear intestinal absorption of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates from their in vitro Km values.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Tachibana; Motohiro Kato; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Use of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry in Human Health and Molecular Toxicology.

Authors:  Heather A Enright; Michael A Malfatti; Maike Zimmermann; Ted Ognibene; Paul Henderson; Kenneth W Turteltaub
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  The role of fMRI in drug development.

Authors:  Owen Carmichael; Adam J Schwarz; Christopher H Chatham; David Scott; Jessica A Turner; Jaymin Upadhyay; Alexandre Coimbra; James A Goodman; Richard Baumgartner; Brett A English; John W Apolzan; Preetham Shankapal; Keely R Hawkins
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 7.851

6.  Early-phase development of cancer prevention agents: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Marjorie Perloff; Vernon E Steele
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-03-06

7.  Pharmacokinetics, absorption, and excretion of radiolabeled revexepride: a Phase I clinical trial using a microtracer and accelerator mass spectrometry-based approach.

Authors:  Stephen Flach; Marie Croft; Jie Ding; Ron Budhram; Todd Pankratz; Mike Pennick; Graeme Scarfe; Steven Troy; Jay Getsy
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 8.  The use of integrated and intelligent testing strategies in the prediction of toxic hazard and in risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael Balls; Robert D Combes; Nirmala Bhogal
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.