Literature DB >> 12729813

Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.

William Consiglio1, Peter Driscoll, Matthew Witte, William P Berg.   

Abstract

This experiment studied the effect of phone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time (RT) in a braking response. Using a laboratory station which simulated the foot activity in driving, 22 research participants were requested to release the accelerator pedal and depress the brake pedal as quickly as possible following the activation of a red brake lamp. Mean reaction time was determined for five conditions: (a) control, (b) listening to a radio, (c) conversing with a passenger, (d) conversing using a hand-held phone, and (e) conversing using a hands-free phone. Results indicated that conversation, whether conducted in-person or via a cellular phone caused RT to slow, whereas listening to music on the radio did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729813     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00027-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  16 in total

1.  Longer term effects of New York State's law on drivers' handheld cell phone use.

Authors:  A T McCartt; L L Geary
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 2.  Vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Brains and Sprains: The Brain's Role in Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Authors:  Charles Buz Swanik
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 5.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Suzanne P McEvoy; Mark R Stevenson; Anne T McCartt; Mark Woodward; Claire Haworth; Peter Palamara; Rina Cercarelli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-12

7.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Timothy A Keller; Jacquelyn Cynkar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The sound of a mobile phone ringing affects the complex reaction time of its owner.

Authors:  Radoslaw Zajdel; Justyna Zajdel; Anna Zwolińska; Janusz Smigielski; Piotr Beling; Tomasz Cegliński; Dariusz Nowak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study.

Authors:  Leah L Thompson; Frederick P Rivara; Rajiv C Ayyagari; Beth E Ebel
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.399

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.