Literature DB >> 12729764

What is the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein?

Ke Fan1, Wei Wang.   

Abstract

Experimental studies have shown that the full sequence complexity of naturally occurring proteins is not required to generate rapidly folding and functional proteins, i.e. proteins can be designed with fewer than 20 letters. This raises the question of what is the minimum number of amino acid types required to encode complex protein folds? Here, we investigate this issue from three aspects. First, we study the minimum sequence complexity that can reserve the necessary structural information for detection of distantly related homologues. Second, we compare the ability of designing foldable model sequences over a wide range of reduced amino acid alphabets, which find the minimum number of letters that have the similar design ability as 20. Finally, we survey the lower bound of alphabet size of globular proteins in a non-redundant protein database. These different approaches give a remarkably consistent view, that the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein is around ten.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729764     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00324-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  17 in total

1.  Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Mainak Guharoy; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A method for computing the inter-residue interaction potentials for reduced amino acid alphabet.

Authors:  Abhinav Luthra; Anupam Nath Jha; G K Ananthasuresh; Saraswathi Vishveswara
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Reduced amino acid alphabets exhibit an improved sensitivity and selectivity in fold assignment.

Authors:  Eric L Peterson; Jané Kondev; Julie A Theriot; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Funneling and frustration in the energy landscapes of some designed and simplified proteins.

Authors:  Ha H Truong; Bobby L Kim; Nicholas P Schafer; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  A reduced amino acid alphabet for understanding and designing protein adaptation to mutation.

Authors:  C Etchebest; C Benros; A Bornot; A-C Camproux; A G de Brevern
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Simplified protein design biased for prebiotic amino acids yields a foldable, halophilic protein.

Authors:  Liam M Longo; Jihun Lee; Michael Blaber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reconstruction and Characterization of Thermally Stable and Catalytically Active Proteins Comprising an Alphabet of ~ 13 Amino Acids.

Authors:  Madoka Kimura; Satoshi Akanuma
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  In the Beginning was a Mutualism - On the Origin of Translation.

Authors:  Marko Vitas; Andrej Dobovišek
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  HMM_RA: an improved method for alpha-helical transmembrane protein topology prediction.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Changhui Yan
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-01-31

10.  Optimized ancestral state reconstruction using Sankoff parsimony.

Authors:  José C Clemente; Kazuho Ikeo; Gabriel Valiente; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.