Literature DB >> 12729429

Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas Advance Directives Act.

Robert L Fine1, Thomas Wm Mayo.   

Abstract

Every U.S. state has developed legal rules to address end-of-life decision making. No law to date has effectively dealt with medical futility--an issue that has engendered significant debate in the medical and legal literature, many court cases, and a formal opinion from the American Medical Association's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. In 1999, Texas was the first state to adopt a law regulating end-of-life decisions, providing a legislatively sanctioned, extrajudicial, due process mechanism for resolving medical futility disputes and other end-of-life ethical disagreements. After 2 years of practical experience with this law, data collected at a large tertiary care teaching hospital strongly suggest that the law represents a first step toward practical resolution of this controversial area of modern health care. As such, the law may be of interest to practitioners, patients, and legislators elsewhere.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729429     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

1.  When doctors and patients disagree about medical futility.

Authors:  Mary S McCabe; Courtney Storm
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Medically Inappropriate or Futile Treatment: Deliberation and Justification.

Authors:  Cheryl J Misak; Douglas B White; Robert D Truog
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2015-12-17

3.  How should clinicians respond to requests for potentially inappropriate treatment?

Authors:  Gabriel T Bosslet; Jozef Kesecioglu; Douglas B White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Medical futility: definition, determination, and disputes in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  From Quinlan to Schiavo: medical, ethical, and legal issues in severe brain injury.

Authors:  Robert L Fine
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

6.  Robert Lee Fine, MD: a conversation with the editor. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.

Authors:  Robert Lee Fine
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

7.  Futility revisited: reflections on the perspectives of families, physicians, and institutions.

Authors:  Allan S Brett
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2005-12

8.  The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: an exercise in futility?

Authors:  David M Zientek
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2005-12

Review 9.  The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.

Authors:  John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Institutional futility policies are inherently unfair.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.