Literature DB >> 12729417

Background radiation: natural and man-made.

M C Thorne1.   

Abstract

A brief overview and comparison is given of dose rates arising from natural background radiation and the fallout from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons. Although there are considerable spatial variations in exposure to natural background radiation, it is useful to give estimates of worldwide average overall exposures from the various components of that background. Cosmic-ray secondaries of low linear energy transfer (LET), mainly muons and photons, deliver about 280 microSv a(-1). Cosmic-ray neutrons deliver about another 100 microSv a(-1). These low- and high-LET exposures are relatively uniform to the whole body. The effective dose rate from cosmogenic radionuclides is dominated by the contribution of 12 microSv a(-1) from 14C. This is due to relatively uniform irradiation of all organs and tissues from low-energy beta particles. Primordial radionuclides and their progeny (principally the 238U and 232Th series, and 40K) contribute about 480 microSv a(-1) of effective dose by external irradiation. This is relatively uniform photon irradiation of the whole body. Internally incorporated 40K contributes a further 165 microSv a(-1) of effective dose in adults, mainly from beta particles, but with a significant gamma component. Equivalent doses from 40K are somewhat higher in muscle than other soft tissues, but the distinction is less than a factor of three. Uranium and thorium series radionuclides give rise to an average effective dose rate of around 120 microSv a(-1). This includes a major alpha particle component, and exposures of radiosensitive tissues in lung, liver, kidney and the skeleton are recognised as important contributors to effective dose. Overall, these various sources give a worldwide average effective dose rate of about 1160 microSv a(-1). Exposure to 222Rn, 220Rn and their short-lived progeny has to be considered separately. This is very variable both within and between countries. For 222Rn and its progeny, a worldwide average effective dose rate is about 1105 microSv a(-1). For 220Rn and its progeny, the corresponding value is 91 microSv a(-1). In both cases, the effective dose is mainly due to a particle irradiation of the bronchial tissues of the lungs. Overall, the worldwide average effective dose rate from natural background is about 2400 microSv a(-1) or 2.4 mSv a(-1). For comparison, worldwide average effective dose rates from weapons fallout peaked at 113 microSv a(-1) (about 5% of natural background) in 1963 and have since fallen to about 5.5 microSv a(-1) (about 0.2% of natural background). These values perhaps serve to emphasise that even gross insults to the natural environment from anthropogenic releases of radioactive materials are likely to be of limited significance when set in the context of the ambient radioactive environment within which all organisms, including humans, have developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729417     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/23/1/302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  8 in total

1.  A study of background radioactivity level for Canakkale, Turkey.

Authors:  Rustu Ilgar; Erol Kam; Ahmet Bozkurt
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Mitteilungen der DGKFO.

Authors:  H Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Colorectal cancer screening: the role of CT colonography.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi; Franco Iafrate; Marco Rengo; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The stable, functional core of DdrA from Deinococcus radiodurans R1 does not restore radioresistance in vivo.

Authors:  Dennis R Harris; Khanh V Ngo; Michael M Cox
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Impact of ATM and DNA-PK Inhibition on Gene Expression and Individual Response of Human Lymphocytes to Mixed Beams of Alpha Particles and X-Rays.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Beata Brzozowska-Wardecka; Halina Lisowska; Andrzej Wojcik; Lovisa Lundholm
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Phase I Clinical Trial of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeting 68Ga-NGUL PET/CT in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Minseok Suh; Hyun Gee Ryoo; Keon Wook Kang; Jae Min Jeong; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Gi Jeong Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.109

7.  Transcriptome analysis reveals a stress response of Shewanella oneidensis deprived of background levels of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Hugo Castillo; Xiaoping Li; Faye Schilkey; Geoffrey B Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lack of correlation of desiccation and radiation tolerance in microorganisms from diverse extreme environments tested under anoxic conditions.

Authors:  Kristina Beblo-Vranesevic; Maria Bohmeier; Alexandra K Perras; Petra Schwendner; Elke Rabbow; Christine Moissl-Eichinger; Charles S Cockell; Pauline Vannier; Viggo T Marteinsson; Euan P Monaghan; Pascale Ehrenfreund; Laura Garcia-Descalzo; Felipe Gómez; Moustafa Malki; Ricardo Amils; Frédéric Gaboyer; Frances Westall; Patricia Cabezas; Nicolas Walter; Petra Rettberg
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.