Literature DB >> 12729311

Documenting procedures and deliveries during family practice residency: a survey of graduates' experiences, preferences, and recommendations.

Chris Vincent1, Sara Kim, Ronald Schneeweiss, Nancy Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The University of Washington Family Practice Residency Network (UW Network) is in the process of implementing a Palm Pilot-based procedure and delivery documentation system throughout 16 residency programs. Our study examined the experiences of past UW Network graduates in obtaining hospital privileges and in documenting procedures and deliveries.
METHODS: A survey was mailed to 201 1999 and 2000 UW Network graduates, asking them questions about their experiences obtaining hospital privileges after graduation and documenting procedures and deliveries during their training.
RESULTS: A total of 124 surveys (62% response rate) were analyzed. Ninety-four percent of the respondents had applied for hospital privileges, and 84% received all the privileges they requested. Forty-four percent indicated they had to provide some written documentation to get hospital privileges, but only 7% had to provide more than a numeric total of procedures or deliveries. Respondents predominantly used log cards and Palm Pilots for data collection. Palm Pilots were preferred over log cards, and the Palm Pilot systems received higher satisfaction ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of graduates, detailed delivery and procedure information was not necessary to obtain hospital privileges. Nevertheless, there are other reasons to document training experiences, and graduates strongly advise family practice residents to record their procedure and delivery experiences. Family practice residency programs should consider giving house staff handheld computers to record the procedures they perform.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Kho; Laura E Henderson; Daniel D Dressler; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  [Scientific basis for using personal digital assistants (PDA) in medical practice].

Authors:  Josep Maria Coll Benejam; Josep Maria Masuet Iglesias
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Rapid access to information resources in clinical biochemistry: medical applications of Personal Digital Assistants (PDA).

Authors:  Muhittin A Serdar; Mustafa Turan; Murat Cihan
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Critical care procedure logging using handheld computers.

Authors:  J Carlos Martinez-Motta; Robin Walker; Thomas E Stewart; John Granton; Simon Abrahamson; Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.