Literature DB >> 12728160

Influence of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on health related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

R S Goldstein1, T R J Todd, G Guyatt, S Keshavjee, T E Dolmage, S van Rooy, B Krip, F Maltais, P LeBlanc, S Pakhale, T K Waddell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of LVRS has been questioned in the absence of trials comparing it with pulmonary rehabilitation, the prevailing standard of care in COPD. Patients with heterogeneous emphysema are more likely to benefit from volume reduction than those with homogeneous disease. Disease specific quality of life is a responsive interpretable outcome that enables health professionals to identify the magnitude of the effect of an intervention across several domains.
METHODS: Non-smoking patients aged <75 years with severe COPD (FEV(1) <40% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC <0.7), hyperinflation, and evidence of heterogeneity were randomised to surgical or control groups after pulmonary rehabilitation and monitored at 3 month intervals for 12 months with no crossover between the groups. The primary outcome was disease specific quality of life as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). Treatment failure was defined as death or functional decline (fall of 1 unit in any two domains of the CRQ). Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function and exercise capacity.
RESULTS: LVRS resulted in significant between group differences in each domain of the CRQ at 12 months (change of 0.5 represents a small but important difference): dyspnoea 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.6; p<0.0001); emotional function 1.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.1; p<0.0001); fatigue 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6; p<0.0001); mastery 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.5; p<0.0001). In the control group one of 27 patients died and 16 experienced functional decline over 12 months. In the surgical group four of 28 patients died and three experienced functional decline (hazard ratio = 3.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6; p=0.01). Between group improvements (p<0.05) in lung volumes, flow rates, and exercise were sustained at 12 months (RV -47% predicted (95% CI -71 to -23; p=0.0002); FEV(1) 0.3 l (95% CI 0.1 to 0. 5; p=0.0003); submaximal exercise 7.3 min (95% CI 3.9 to 10.8; p<0.0001); 6 minute walk 66 metres (95% CI 32 to 101; p=0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients with heterogeneous emphysema, LVRS resulted in important benefits in disease specific quality of life compared with medical management, which were sustained at 12 months after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728160      PMCID: PMC1746667          DOI: 10.1136/thorax.58.5.405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  27 in total

1.  Clinical experimentation. Lessons from lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  M R Tonelli; J O Benditt; R K Albert
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Interpreting small differences in functional status: the Six Minute Walk test in chronic lung disease patients.

Authors:  D A Redelmeier; A M Bayoumi; R S Goldstein; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Prospective randomized trial comparing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery to pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  G J Criner; F C Cordova; S Furukawa; A M Kuzma; J M Travaline; V Leyenson; G M O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Lung function 12 months following emphysema resection.

Authors:  A F Gelb; M Brenner; R J McKenna; N Zamel; R Fischel; J D Epstein
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Patient selection criteria for lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  R J McKenna; M Brenner; R J Fischel; N Singh; B Yoong; A F Gelb; K E Osann
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Changes in breathing and ventilatory muscle recruitment patterns induced by lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  J O Benditt; D E Wood; F D McCool; S Lewis; R K Albert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema.

Authors:  J D Cooper; G A Patterson; R S Sundaresan; E P Trulock; R D Yusen; M S Pohl; S S Lefrak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Extended indications for lung volume reduction surgery in advanced emphysema.

Authors:  M Argenziano; N Moazami; B Thomashow; P A Jellen; L A Gorenstein; E A Rose; A D Weinberg; K M Steinglass; M E Ginsburg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema: out on a limb without a NETT.

Authors:  J P Utz; R D Hubmayr; C Deschamps
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Spirometry and dyspnea in patients with COPD. When small differences mean little.

Authors:  D A Redelmeier; R S Goldstein; S T Min; R H Hyland
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Several clinical interests regarding lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Wen R Wang; Bo Deng; You Q Tan; Guang Y Jiang; Hai Jing Zhou; Yong He
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 2.  COPD exacerbations. 4: Prevention.

Authors:  S Scott; P Walker; P M A Calverley
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Tommaso Claudio Mineo; Eugenio Pompeo; Davide Mineo; Frederico Tacconi; Mario Marino; Alessandro Fabrizio Sabato
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?

Authors:  Gordon Guyatt; Holger Schunemann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  History of lung volume reduction procedures.

Authors:  Almerico Marruchella; Paola Faverio; Giulia Bonaiti; Alberto Pesci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Lung volume reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema.

Authors:  Joseph Em van Agteren; Kristin V Carson; Leong Ung Tiong; Brian J Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-14

7.  Lung volume reduction surgery since the National Emphysema Treatment Trial: study of Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; Glen E Leverson; Wassim Abi Jaoude; James D Maloney
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema.

Authors:  Edward P Ingenito; Douglas E Wood; James P Utz
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

9.  Comparison between the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D quality of life (QOL) questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

Authors:  Sowmyanarayanan Thuppal; Stephen Markwell; Traves Crabtree; Stephen Hazelrigg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Surgical and endoscopic treatment for COPD: patients selection, techniques and results.

Authors:  Fabrizio Minervini; Peter B Kestenholz; Valentina Paolini; Alberto Pesci; Lidia Libretti; Luca Bertolaccini; Marco Scarci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.