Literature DB >> 12727800

Susceptibility to prostate cancer: studies on interactions between UVR exposure and skin type.

Dhaval Bodiwala1, Christopher J Luscombe, Michael E French, Samson Liu, Mark F Saxby, Peter W Jones, Sudarshan Ramachandran, Anthony A Fryer, Richard C Strange.   

Abstract

Recent studies have proposed that exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) protects against development of some internal cancers including that in prostate. This effect may be mediated by UVR-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. It is also proposed that ability to pigment in response to UVR will influence susceptibility to prostate cancer through its effects on vitamin D synthesis. We wished to determine first, whether ability to pigment, as assessed by skin type, influences the extent of exposure to UVR, secondly, whether skin type is associated with prostate cancer susceptibility and thirdly, whether such an effect is mediated by the extent of UVR exposure. We studied 453 prostatic adenocarcinoma and 312 benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) patients using a validated questionnaire to assess two parameters of exposure; months of cumulative exposure per year and adult sunbathing score. We used analysis of variance to show that cancer cases with sun-sensitive skin (skin type 1) had lower cumulative exposure per year (P = 0.014) and sunbathing scores (P < 0.0001) than those with type 4, possibly because of a tendency to avoid exposure. Further, cumulative exposure per year and sunbathing score were significantly lower in cancer compared with BPH patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). While the proportion of subjects with skin types 1 and 2 was lower in cancer than BPH patients, these were not significantly different (logistic regression analysis, skin type 1 versus type 4; P = 0.11). We used recursive partitioning to determine if skin type influenced susceptibility to prostate cancer in subgroups stratified by exposure. Analysis of the data showed that in men with low sunbathing scores, skin type 1 conferred protection compared with skin types 2-4 (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 3.01-8.25, P < 0.0009). These findings indicate that susceptibility to prostate cancer is in part determined by extent of exposure to UVR and that ability to pigment mediates this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12727800     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgg021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  10 in total

1.  Life course sun exposure and risk of prostate cancer: population-based nested case-control study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; Steven E Oliver; David C Whiteman; Chris Bain; Andy Ness; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The Association Between the Genetic VDR SNP c.907+75C>T and Prostate Cancer Risk Is Modified by Tanning Potential.

Authors:  Desta A Beyene; Mohammad R Daremipouran; Victor Apprey; Tammey Naab; Olakunle O Kassim; Robert L Copeland; Yasmine M Kanaan
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 3.  DHPLC Elution Patterns of VDR PCR Products Can Predict Prostate Cancer Susceptibility in African American Men.

Authors:  Robert L Copeland; Desta Beyene; Victor Apprey; Mohammad R Daremipouran; Tammey J Naab; Olakunle O Kassim; Yasmine M Kanaan
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  Serum 25-OH vitamin D levels and risk of developing prostate cancer in older men.

Authors:  Christine M Barnett; Carrie M Nielson; Jackie Shannon; June M Chan; James M Shikany; Douglas C Bauer; Andrew R Hoffman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Eric Orwoll; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Vitamin d, sunlight and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Krishna Vanaja Donkena; Charles Y F Young
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-08

6.  Sunlight exposure during leisure activities and risk of prostate cancer in Montréal, Canada, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Jennifer Yu; Jérôme Lavoué; Marie-Élise Parent
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Extra-Skeletal Effects of Vitamin D.

Authors:  Rose Marino; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Using genetic proxies for lifecourse sun exposure to assess the causal relationship of sun exposure with circulating vitamin d and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Rebecca Gilbert; John P Kemp; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; William D Fraser; Smith George Davey; Sarah J Lewis; Mark Lathrop; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Pigmentation-related phenotypes and risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  S J Weinstein; J Virtamo; D Albanes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Pigmentation phototype and prostate and breast cancer in a select Spanish population-A Mendelian randomization analysis in the MCC-Spain study.

Authors:  Inés Gómez-Acebo; Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos; Camilo Palazuelos; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Jéssica Alonso-Molero; Carmen Urtiaga; Tania Fernández-Villa; Eva Ardanaz; Manuel Rivas-Del-Fresno; Ana Molina-Barceló; José-Juan Jiménez-Moleón; Lidia García-Martinez; Pilar Amiano; Paz Rodriguez-Cundin; Víctor Moreno; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Nuria Aragonés; Manolis Kogevinas; Marina Pollán; Javier Llorca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.