Literature DB >> 12727042

Variations in patients' self-report of pain by treatment setting.

Cielito C Reyes-Gibby1, Linda L McCrory, Charles S Cleeland.   

Abstract

Patient reluctance to report pain has been shown to be a primary reason for inadequate pain control among cancer patients. Very little is known about whether patients' self-reports of pain vary by treatment settings. We reviewed 63 medical records of female breast cancer patients who visited two treatment settings on the same day in a tertiary cancer center in the United States. Patients' rating of pain (on a 0 [no pain]-10 scale) were abstracted. Results showed discrepancies regarding patients' self-reports of pain intensity in the two treatment settings. Fifty-one percent of patients' self-report of pain differed between the two treatment settings, with 38% reporting a pain score > or =4 in the outpatient breast clinic and =0 in the outpatient chemotherapy clinic. Although it is expected that pain may vary on a sporadic or activity-related basis, these results may also indicate the need to review clinic staffs' methods of assessing patients about their pain and a review of documentation practices of pain assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12727042     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00077-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances in opioid therapy and formulations.

Authors:  Declan Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Routine symptom assessment: good for practice and good for business.

Authors:  Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Concordance between patient reports of cancer-related symptoms and medical records documentation.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Gwen Wyatt; Deimante Tamkus; David Victorson; Mohammad Hossein Rahbar; Suzie Ahn
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Pain intensity assessment by bedside nurses and palliative care consultants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eduardo Bruera; Jie S Willey; Patricia A Ewert-Flannagan; Mary K Cline; Guddi Kaur; Loren Shen; Tao Zhang; J Lynn Palmer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Assessing persistent cancer pain: a comparison of current pain ratings and pain recalled from the past week.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Xin Shelley Wang; Tito R Mendoza; Kishan J Pandya; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The detection and treatment of cancer-related functional problems in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  A L Cheville; L A Beck; T L Petersen; R S Marks; G L Gamble
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Sub-optimal pain control in patients with rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Barry J Sheane; Frank Doyle; Christina Doyle; Ciara O'Loughlin; Donough Howard; Gaye Cunnane
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Making sense of phantom limb pain.

Authors:  Hunter R Schone; Chris I Baker; Joel Katz; Lone Nikolajsen; Katleho Limakatso; Herta Flor; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 13.654

Review 9.  Paramedic assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired adult patient.

Authors:  Bill Lord
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.