Literature DB >> 12726872

Willingness to use instant home HIV tests: data from the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey.

Kathryn A Phillips1, James L Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although home collection HIV tests are available in the United States, home HIV tests providing instant results are not available. The objective of this study was to examine willingness to use instant home HIV tests and what test characteristics are most important to individuals.
METHODS: Six questions were added to the 1999 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) (n =2964). This state-representative survey is part of the ongoing, 50-state BRFSS sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to examine willingness to use instant home HIV tests and preferences for HIV test characteristics.
RESULTS: Over one third (37%) of respondents would consider using an instant home HIV test. Respondents willing to use instant home tests were more likely to be Hispanic (odds ratio [OR]=1.55; confidence interval [CI]=1.03-2.34); to have not previously been tested for HIV (OR=1.72; CI=1.20-2.45); to be more likely to plan to be tested in the next 12 months (OR=1.17; CI=1.00-1.37); and to prefer urine sample collection (OR=1.56; CI=1.03-2.37).
CONCLUSION: Over one third of respondents in a large, state-representative sample would consider using an instant home HIV test. Hispanics, individuals who planned to be tested in the next 12 months, and individuals who had never been tested were more willing to use instant home tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12726872     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00019-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Acceptability of home self-tests for HIV in New York City, 2006.

Authors:  Julie E Myers; Sara Bodach; Blayne H Cutler; Colin W Shepard; Christopher Philippou; Bernard M Branson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol).

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Martine H P Ickenroth; Nanne K de Vries; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gaby Ronda; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Home testing for HIV infection in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Ingrid V Bassett; Krista L Dong; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.071

5.  Accuracy and user-acceptability of HIV self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid test.

Authors:  Oon Tek Ng; Angela L Chow; Vernon J Lee; Mark I C Chen; Mar Kyaw Win; Hiok Hee Tan; Arlene Chua; Yee Sin Leo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  To test or not to test: a cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV.

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Gaby Ronda; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Acceptability and intended usage preferences for six HIV testing options among internet-using men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Akshay Sharma; Rob B Stephenson; Darcy White; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-02-24

8.  A review of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) rapid testing.

Authors:  S Ha; S Foley; D Paquette; J Seto
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 9.  A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention.

Authors:  Sue Napierala Mavedzenge; Rachel Baggaley; Elizabeth L Corbett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Janne Krause; Friederike Subklew-Sehume; Chris Kenyon; Robert Colebunders
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.