Literature DB >> 12726865

Chemosensitivity linked to p73 function.

Meredith S Irwin1, Keiichi Kondo, Maria Carmen Marin, Lynn S Cheng, William C Hahn, William G Kaelin.   

Abstract

Most chemotherapeutic agents induce DNA damage, leading to p53 accumulation and apoptosis. The factors that determine chemosensitivity in p53-defective tumor cells are poorly understood. We found that the p53 family member p73 is induced by a wide variety of chemotherapeutic drugs. Blocking p73 function with a dominant-negative mutant, siRNA, or homologous recombination led to chemoresistance of human tumor cells and engineered transformed cells, irrespective of p53 status. Mutant p53 can inactivate p73 and downregulation of mutant p53 enhanced chemosensitivity. These findings indicate that p73 is a determinant of chemotherapeutic efficacy in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12726865     DOI: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cell        ISSN: 1535-6108            Impact factor:   31.743


  155 in total

1.  SAHA shows preferential cytotoxicity in mutant p53 cancer cells by destabilizing mutant p53 through inhibition of the HDAC6-Hsp90 chaperone axis.

Authors:  D Li; N D Marchenko; U M Moll
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  TopBP1 mediates mutant p53 gain of function through NF-Y and p63/p73.

Authors:  Kang Liu; Shiyun Ling; Weei-Chin Lin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  DeltaNp73beta is active in transactivation and growth suppression.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Susan Nozell; Hui Xiao; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DNA damage signals through differentially modified E2F1 molecules to induce apoptosis.

Authors:  Jasmyne Carnevale; Oliva Palander; Laurie A Seifried; Frederick A Dick
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Mutant p53 cooperates with ETS2 to promote etoposide resistance.

Authors:  Phi M Do; Lakshman Varanasi; Songqing Fan; Chunyang Li; Iwona Kubacka; Virginia Newman; Krishna Chauhan; Silvano Rakeem Daniels; Maurizio Boccetta; Michael R Garrett; Runzhao Li; Luis A Martinez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Mammary epithelial cell polarity is regulated differentially by p73 isoforms via epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhang; Wensheng Yan; Yong Sam Jung; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Complex regulation of p73 isoforms after alteration of amyloid precursor polypeptide (APP) function and DNA damage in neurons.

Authors:  Samir Benosman; Xiangjun Meng; Yannick Von Grabowiecki; Lavinia Palamiuc; Lucian Hritcu; Isabelle Gross; Georg Mellitzer; Yoichi Taya; Jean-Philippe Loeffler; Christian Gaiddon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Disruption of p73-MDM2 binding synergizes with gemcitabine to induce apoptosis in HuCCT1 cholangiocarcinoma cell line with p53 mutation.

Authors:  Tongsen Zheng; Jiabei Wang; Xi Chen; Xianzhi Meng; Xuan Song; Zhaoyang Lu; Hongchi Jiang; Lianxin Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-04-27

9.  Significant associations of mismatch repair gene polymorphisms with clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Dong; Li Jiao; Yanan Li; Douglas B Evans; Huamin Wang; Kenneth R Hess; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Differential regulation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) by the p53 Family: p73-dependent induction of VDR upon DNA damage.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Kommagani; Vandana Payal; Madhavi P Kadakia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.