Literature DB >> 12725770

Optimal spline smoothing of fMRI time series by generalized cross-validation.

John D Carew1, Grace Wahba, Xianhong Xie, Erik V Nordheim, M Elizabeth Meyerand.   

Abstract

Linear parametric regression models of fMRI time series have correlated residuals. One approach to address this problem is to condition the autocorrelation structure by temporal smoothing. Smoothing splines with the degree of smoothing selected by generalized cross-validation (GCV-spline) provide a method to find an optimal smoother for an fMRI time series. The purpose of this study was to determine if GCV-spline of fMRI time series yields unbiased variance estimates of linear regression model parameters. GCV-spline was evaluated with a real fMRI data set and bias of the variance estimator was computed for simulated time series with autocorrelation structures derived from fMRI data. This study only considered fMRI experimental designs of boxcar type. The results from the real data suggest that GCV-spline determines appropriate amounts of smoothing. The simulations show that the variance estimates are, on average, unbiased. The unbiased variance estimates come at some cost to signal detection efficiency. This study demonstrates that GCV-spline is an appropriate method for smoothing fMRI time series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12725770     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00013-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Functional principal component analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Roberto Viviani; Georg Grön; Manfred Spitzer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Fusing EEG and fMRI based on a bottom-up model: inferring activation and effective connectivity in neural masses.

Authors:  J Riera; E Aubert; K Iwata; R Kawashima; X Wan; T Ozaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Regularization parameter selection for nonlinear iterative image restoration and MRI reconstruction using GCV and SURE-based methods.

Authors:  Sathish Ramani; Zhihao Liu; Jeffrey Rosen; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Modeling dose-dependent neural processing responses using mixed effects spline models: with application to a PET study of ethanol.

Authors:  Ying Guo; F DuBois Bowman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Estimation and Classification of BOLD Responses Over Multiple Trials.

Authors:  Kush Kapur; Anindya Roy; Dulal K Bhaumik; Robert D Gibbons; Nicole A Lazar; John A Sweeney; Subhash Aryal; Dave Patterson
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.893

6.  Automated discretization of 'transpiration restriction to increasing VPD' features from outdoors high-throughput phenotyping data.

Authors:  Soumyashree Kar; Ryokei Tanaka; Lijalem Balcha Korbu; Jana Kholová; Hiroyoshi Iwata; Surya S Durbha; J Adinarayana; Vincent Vadez
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.993

7.  Non-cartesian MRI reconstruction with automatic regularization Via Monte-Carlo SURE.

Authors:  Sathish Ramani; Daniel S Weller; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Preserved canonicality of the BOLD hemodynamic response reflects healthy cognition: Insights into the healthy brain through the window of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Monroe P Turner; Nicholas A Hubbard; Dinesh K Sivakolundu; Lyndahl M Himes; Joanna L Hutchison; John Hart; Jeffrey S Spence; Elliot M Frohman; Teresa C Frohman; Darin T Okuda; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Evaluating the impact of spatio-temporal smoothness constraints on the BOLD hemodynamic response function estimation: an analysis based on Tikhonov regularization.

Authors:  R Casanova; L Yang; W D Hairston; P J Laurienti; J A Maldjian
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.833

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.