Literature DB >> 12725762

The ERP omitted stimulus response to "no-stim" events and its implications for fast-rate event-related fMRI designs.

Laura Busse1, Marty G Woldorff.   

Abstract

A major difficulty in fast-rate event-related fMRI experiments is the extensive overlap from adjacent trials in the stimulus sequence. One approach to address this problem is to include "no-stim" or "null" events as a trial type. These are randomized as if they were true stimulus events but no stimulus actually occurs. Assuming that no response is elicited by the null events, their time-locked average reflects only the averaged overlap. Thus, contrasting the averages for the other trial types versus the null-event average subtracts out the overlap, enabling the extraction of the response functions for these other trial types. ERP studies, however, have indicated that an endogenous brain response, the omitted stimulus response (OSR), can be evoked by a missing event in a stream of regularly occurring stimuli. To the extent that this response is elicited by null events in an event-related fMRI experiment, the null-event subtraction or contrast would falsely introduce the inverse of the OSR into the averaged responses to the other trial types. Using high-density ERP recordings, we investigated the effect of different percentages of omitted stimuli (11, 22, and 33%) on the auditory OSR at stimulus rates of one event per second or one event per 2 s. Significant OSRs were found for each percentage in the 1-s condition as well as in the 11% 2-s condition. The responses consisted of an early posterior negative wave (180-280 ms) followed by a larger anterior positive wave. These results have important implications for fast-rate fMRI designs, while also providing new data on the brain's response to omitted stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12725762     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00012-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The relation of brain oscillations to attentional networks.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Jennie Byrne; Michael S Worden; Kevin G Guise; Bruce D McCandliss; John Fossella; Michael I Posner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Detection and prediction of periodic patterns by the retina.

Authors:  Greg Schwartz; Rob Harris; David Shrom; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Psychophysiological Evidence of Response Conflict and Strategic Control of Responses in Affective Priming.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Monica A Schepers Riordan; J Scott Saults; Sarah A Lust
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03-05

7.  An oscillatory circuit underlying the detection of disruptions in temporally-periodic patterns.

Authors:  Juan Gao; Greg Schwartz; Michael J Berry; Philip Holmes
Journal:  Network       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.273

8.  Look who's talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Dave Saint-Amour; Thomas Gruber; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Event-related potentials reveal temporal staging of dynamic facial expression and gaze shift effects on attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.