Literature DB >> 12723797

Evaluation of oral and subcutaneous delivery of an experimental canarypox recombinant canine distemper vaccine in the Siberian polecat (Mustela eversmanni).

Jeffrey Wimsatt1, Dean Biggins, Kim Innes, Bobbi Taylor, Della Garell.   

Abstract

We assessed the safety and efficacy of an experimental canarypox-vectored recombinant canine distemper virus (CDV) subunit vaccine in the Siberian polecat (Mustela eversmanni), a close relative of the black-footed ferret, (M. nigripes), an endangered species that is highly susceptible to the virus. Siberian polecats were randomized into six treatment groups. Recombinant canine distemper vaccine was administered s.c. at three dose levels (10(4.5), 10(5.0), and 10(5.5) plaque-forming units [PFU] per dose) and was administered orally by spraying the vaccine into the oropharnyx at two dose levels (10(5.5), 10(8.0) PFU per dose). The sixth group of control animals was not vaccinated. For both routes of administration, two 1-ml doses of reconstituted vaccine were delivered 4 wk apart, followed by live virus challenge 3 wk after the second vaccination. During the challenge, Synder Hill test strain CDV obtained from the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, was administered i.p. Serial blood samples for CDV serology were collected immediately before vaccination and challenge, and 10, 15, and 20 days after challenge. Clinical signs and body weights were recorded up to 32 days after challenge. The survival rate in animals receiving vaccine at the highest oral dose (10(8.0) PFU per dose) was 83.3%. Survival rate was 50.0% in the high s.c. and 60.0% in the medium s.c. groups. All animals in the low-s.c. dose, low-oral dose, and control groups died after exposure. Vaccine dose overall (oral and s.c.) and dose in response to s.c. administration when considered alone were significant predictors of survival (P = 0.006 and P = 0.04, respectively). Among the polecats challenged with virulent virus, those that died became sick sooner than those that survived. Animals that died lost significantly more weight during the 10 days after challenge than did animals that survived (P = 0.02). Survival rates did not differ by sex, founder female status, or breeding pedigree in any of the treatment groups. Survival rates were higher in animals with increasing serum neutralization titers (P = 0.027). This study demonstrates the efficacy of oral delivery of a recombinant CDV vaccine in the Siberian polecat. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vectored recombinant vaccines in highly susceptible species and especially in those species in which vaccination with modified live CDV has led to disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12723797     DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260(2003)34[0025:EOOASD]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zoo Wildl Med        ISSN: 1042-7260            Impact factor:   0.776


  9 in total

1.  Development of a challenge-protective vaccine concept by modification of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of canine distemper virus.

Authors:  D Silin; O Lyubomska; M Ludlow; W P Duprex; B K Rima
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Dynamics of a morbillivirus at the domestic-wildlife interface: Canine distemper virus in domestic dogs and lions.

Authors:  Mafalda Viana; Sarah Cleaveland; Jason Matthiopoulos; Jo Halliday; Craig Packer; Meggan E Craft; Katie Hampson; Anna Czupryna; Andrew P Dobson; Edward J Dubovi; Eblate Ernest; Robert Fyumagwa; Richard Hoare; J Grant C Hopcraft; Daniel L Horton; Magai T Kaare; Theo Kanellos; Felix Lankester; Christine Mentzel; Titus Mlengeya; Imam Mzimbiri; Emi Takahashi; Brian Willett; Daniel T Haydon; Tiziana Lembo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Canine distemper spillover in domestic dogs from urban wildlife.

Authors:  Sanjay Kapil; Teresa J Yeary
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.093

4.  Vaccination and monitoring strategies for epidemic prevention and detection in the Channel Island fox (Urocyon littoralis).

Authors:  Jessica N Sanchez; Brian R Hudgens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Antiviral Screen against Canine Distemper Virus-Induced Membrane Fusion Activity.

Authors:  Neeta Shrestha; Flavio M Gall; Jonathan Vesin; Marc Chambon; Gerardo Turcatti; Dimitrios Fotiadis; Rainer Riedl; Philippe Plattet
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  A Single Oral Immunization with Replication-Competent Adenovirus-Vectored Vaccine Induces a Neutralizing Antibody Response in Mice against Canine Distemper Virus.

Authors:  Xiang Du; Emeline Goffin; Lucie Gillard; Bénédicte Machiels; Laurent Gillet
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 7.  Morbillivirus vaccines: recent successes and future hopes.

Authors:  Hubert Buczkowski; Murali Muniraju; Satya Parida; Ashley C Banyard
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Ferrets as a model for morbillivirus pathogenesis, complications, and vaccines.

Authors:  S Pillet; N Svitek; V von Messling
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 9.  Viral Pathogenesis, Recombinant Vaccines, and Oncolytic Virotherapy: Applications of the Canine Distemper Virus Reverse Genetics System.

Authors:  Jianjun Zhao; Yanrong Ren; Jie Chen; Jiasan Zheng; Dongbo Sun
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.048

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.