OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has come into widespread use with the availability adequate coronary stabilization devices. We studied the efficacy of second-generation coronary stabilization devices (suction device) comparing to the first-generation device (compression device). METHODS: We prospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent isolated off-pump CABG via a midline sternotomy at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between July 1, 1996, and August 31, 2000, comparing perioperative, and follow-up data in the group using a suction device (group S) to that in the group using a compression device (group C). RESULTS: Preoperative risk factors were identical between the two groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of three vessel disease in group S. Complete revascularization increased from 47.3% in group C to 88.1% in group S, and the number of distal anastomoses from 2.1 +/- 0.6 in group C to 2.9 +/- 0.9 in group S. Revascularization of the circumflex artery was achieved in 21.7% of group S patients, which was significantly higher than that in group C (2.2%). Postoperative recovery, mortality, and morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Calculated event-free rates at 2 years was 88.7% in group C and 92.0% in group S (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis to the posterior wall of the heart using the suction device is safe. An increased number of distal anastomoses may reduce the occurrence of cardiac events related to incomplete revascularization.
OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has come into widespread use with the availability adequate coronary stabilization devices. We studied the efficacy of second-generation coronary stabilization devices (suction device) comparing to the first-generation device (compression device). METHODS: We prospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent isolated off-pump CABG via a midline sternotomy at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between July 1, 1996, and August 31, 2000, comparing perioperative, and follow-up data in the group using a suction device (group S) to that in the group using a compression device (group C). RESULTS: Preoperative risk factors were identical between the two groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of three vessel disease in group S. Complete revascularization increased from 47.3% in group C to 88.1% in group S, and the number of distal anastomoses from 2.1 +/- 0.6 in group C to 2.9 +/- 0.9 in group S. Revascularization of the circumflex artery was achieved in 21.7% of group S patients, which was significantly higher than that in group C (2.2%). Postoperative recovery, mortality, and morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Calculated event-free rates at 2 years was 88.7% in group C and 92.0% in group S (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis to the posterior wall of the heart using the suction device is safe. An increased number of distal anastomoses may reduce the occurrence of cardiac events related to incomplete revascularization.
Authors: T A Folliguet; F Laborde; J Temkine; A Dibie; P Bourel; P Y Etienne; M C Malergue Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: G W Roach; M Kanchuger; C M Mangano; M Newman; N Nussmeier; R Wolman; A Aggarwal; K Marschall; S H Graham; C Ley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245