Literature DB >> 12721831

Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity?

U Brose1.   

Abstract

Two hypotheses of bottom-up control that predict that the species richness of Carabidae will depend either on the taxonomic diversity of plants ("taxonomic diversity hypothesis") or on the structural heterogeneity of the vegetation ("structural heterogeneity hypothesis") were tested. Plant species were classified into nine plant structural groups through cluster analysis of morphological traits (e.g. total height) at 30 early successional temporary wetlands in the east-German agricultural landscape. In a linear regression analysis, the heterogeneity of vegetation structures explained 55% of the variation in carabid beetle diversity. According to a partial correlation analysis, plant taxonomic diversity did not have a significant effect, consistent with the "structural heterogeneity hypothesis," and contradicting previous studies which concluded that plant taxonomic diversity would be the most important factor in early successional habitats. An experimental study was used to test hypotheses on the processes underlying this bottom-up control by vegetation structure: the "hunting efficiency hypothesis," the "enemy-free space hypothesis," and the "microhabitat specialization hypothesis." The composition of plant structural groups in 15 vegetation plots (1 m(2)) was manipulated, creating a gradient from dense vegetation to open plots. Subsequent pitfall catches revealed significant differences in the activity-abundances of the carabid species. Large species preferred dense vegetation plots, consistent with the enemy-free space hypothesis that large species are more vulnerable to predation on the open plots and prefer dense vegetation to escape from natural enemies. The results indicate that bottom-up control is not mediated only by plant taxonomic or functional group diversity and that vegetation structures may be more important than previously suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12721831     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1222-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity.

Authors:  E Siemann; D Tilman; J Haarstad; M Ritchie
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The importance of food and space in limiting web-spider densities; a test using field enclosures.

Authors:  Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total
  23 in total

1.  Understanding community structure: a data-driven multivariate approach.

Authors:  Monica L Beals
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of tree and herb biodiversity on Diptera, a hyperdiverse insect order.

Authors:  Christoph Scherber; Elke A Vockenhuber; Andreas Stark; Hans Meyer; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of management outweigh effects of plant diversity on restored animal communities in tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Peter W Guiden; Nicholas A Barber; Ryan Blackburn; Anna Farrell; Jessica Fliginger; Sheryl C Hosler; Richard B King; Melissa Nelson; Erin G Rowland; Kirstie Savage; John P Vanek; Holly P Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Disentangling the effects of farmland use, habitat edges, and vegetation structure on ground beetle morphological traits.

Authors:  Katherina Ng; Philip S Barton; Wade Blanchard; Maldwyn J Evans; David B Lindenmayer; Sarina Macfadyen; Sue McIntyre; Don A Driscoll
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of timing of grazing on arthropod communities in semi-natural grasslands.

Authors:  Lisette Lenoir; Tommy Lennartsson
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Useful model organisms, indicators, or both? Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) reflecting environmental conditions.

Authors:  Matti J Koivula
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.546

7.  Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat.

Authors:  Tanja Lessel; Michael Thomas Marx; Gerhard Eisenbeis
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Habitat disturbance and hydrological parameters determine the body size and reproductive strategy of alluvial ground beetles.

Authors:  Michael Gerisch
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Spatial factors play a major role as determinants of endemic ground beetle beta diversity of Madeira Island Laurisilva.

Authors:  Mário Boieiro; José C Carvalho; Pedro Cardoso; Carlos A S Aguiar; Carla Rego; Israel de Faria e Silva; Isabel R Amorim; Fernando Pereira; Eduardo B Azevedo; Paulo A V Borges; Artur R M Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.

Authors:  Gemma Rutten; Andreas Ensslin; Andreas Hemp; Markus Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.