Literature DB >> 12721246

Indium-111-capromab pendetide radioimmunoscintigraphy and prognosis for durable biochemical response to salvage radiation therapy in men after failed prostatectomy.

Cherry T Thomas1, Patrick T Bradshaw, Brad H Pollock, James E Montie, Jeremy M G Taylor, Howard D Thames, Patrick W McLaughlin, David A DeBiose, David H Hussey, Richard L Wahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prognostic significance of indium-111 (111In)-capromab pendetide imaging for patients with prostate cancer who underwent salvage radiotherapy (RT) for recurrent disease after prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records were reviewed for all men who underwent 111In-capromab pendetide imaging at a single institution from February 1997 through December 1999. We identified 30 eligible men who were radiographically negative for metastatic disease, who had increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary radical prostatectomy, and who received salvage RT. Clinical interpretations of indium monoclonal antibody (In-mab) scan results were compared with postsalvage RT PSA response.
RESULTS: Using an American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology definition of PSA failure, in men with a positive scan in at least one location (n = 14), the cumulative 2-year PSA control after salvage RT was 0.38 +/- 0.13 (+/- SE) compared with 0.31 +/- 0.13 for men with a normal antibody scan in and outside the prostate fossa (n = 15; proportional hazard ratio [PHR] = 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 3.36). For men with a positive antibody scan limited to the prostate fossa (n = 9), PSA control at 2 years was 0.13 +/- 0.12 (PHR 1.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 4.85). The 2-year probability of PSA control after salvage RT for men with positive scan results outside the prostate bed irrespective of In-mab findings in the prostate fossa (n = 5) was 0.60 +/- 0.22 (PHR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.17 to 3.78).
CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports, for patients with postprostatectomy biochemical relapse who received salvage RT, presalvage RT In-mab scan findings outside the prostate fossa were not predictive of biochemical control after RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12721246     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? For.

Authors:  Ferruccio Fazio; Maria Picchio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? Against.

Authors:  Klaus Zöphel; Jörg Kotzerke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  ProstaScint(R) Scan: Contemporary Use in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  The emergence of radioimmunoscintigraphy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Keane; Inger L Rosner; M Scott Wingo; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Richard Choo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 7.  Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Chien Peter Chen; Charles C Hsu; Norbert Kased; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Translational Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ana P Kiess; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2013-09-01

9.  Overview of prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Sam S Chang
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

10.  Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; Peter Choyke; Donald S Coffey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.