Literature DB >> 12720000

Reconstruction of the radionuclide spectrum of liquid radioactive waste released into the Techa river in 1949-1951.

Yuri G Mokrov1.   

Abstract

The major part of the liquid radioactive waste released by the Mayak Production Association (PA) radiochemical plant into the Techa river occurred in 1949-1951, but there is information on only one single radiochemical analysis of a water sample taken on 24 and 25 September 1951. These data are here used to assess the spectrum of radionuclides that were released between 1949 and 1951. For this purpose, details of the radiochemical methods of radionuclide extraction and radiometric measurements of beta-activity used at Mayak PA in the 1950s have been taken into account. It is concluded that the data from the radiochemical measurements agree with the theoretical composition of fission products in uranium after exposure times in the reactor (120 days) and subsequent hold times (35 days) that were typical for the procedures at that time. The results of the analysis are at variance with assumptions that underlie the current Techa river dosimetry system. They confirm the conclusion that the external doses to the Techa river residents in the critical period up to 1952 were predominantly due to short-lived fission products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12720000     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-003-0182-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of historical monitoring data on Techa River contamination.

Authors:  M I Vorobiova; M O Degteva; D S Burmistrov; N G Safronova; V P Kozheurov; L R Anspaugh; B A Napier
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  A reconsideration of the external dose assessment for the Techa river population.

Authors:  Yuri G Mokrov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  The Southern Urals radiation studies. A reappraisal of the current status.

Authors:  A M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 1.925

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  On an evaluation of external dose values in the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS) 2000.

Authors:  P Jacob; Y Göksu; V Taranenko; R Meckbach; N G Bougrov; M O Degteva; M I Vorobiova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Radioactive contamination of bottom sediments in the upper reaches of the Techa river: analysis of the data obtained in 1950 and 1951.

Authors:  Yury G Mokrov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Risk quantification.

Authors:  A M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  External radiation exposure of residents living close to the Mayak facility: main sources, dose estimates, and comparison with earlier assessments.

Authors:  Yury G Mokrov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Dose assessment for the Metlino and Muslyumovo populations who lived along the Techa river from 1949 to 1954.

Authors:  Yuri G Mokrov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Otoliths as object of EPR dosimetric research.

Authors:  D V Ivanov; E A Shishkina; D I Osipov; V I Starichenko; S N Bayankin; M V Zhukovsky; E A Pryakhin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Reconstruction of the contamination of the Techa River in 1949-1951 as a result of releases from the "Mayak" Production Association.

Authors:  N B Shagina; M I Vorobiova; M O Degteva; L M Peremyslova; E A Shishkina; L R Anspaugh; B A Napier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Overview of dose assessment developments and the health of riverside residents close to the "Mayak" PA facilities, Russia.

Authors:  William J F Standring; Mark Dowdall; Per Strand
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.