S Y Yoo1, J K Han, Y H Kim, T K Kim, B I Choi, M C Han. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the radiologic findings and clinical course of focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomographic (CT) and sonographic scans in 20 patients (18 male, two female; mean age, 50 years) with pathologically or clinically proven focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver by two experienced radiologists in our institute from August 1995 to June 1999. We also correlated radiologic findings with peripheral eosinophil count. Radiologic and clinical findings during the follow-up (range, 2-49 months; mean, 19.5 months) also were analyzed. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms and signs included abdominal pain (n = 4), easy fatigability (n = 3), weight loss (n = 1), and peripheral eosinophilia (n = 19). Twelve patients were asymptomatic. On sonographic examinations, all lesions were seen as focal, low echoic nodules. On CT, the lesions appeared isoattenuated or low attenuated in the arterial phase and low attenuated in the portal phase, except one case that showed high attenuation in the arterial phase. The margins of most lesions appeared poorly defined. Lesions were single (n = 9) and multiple: two to five (n = 6), six to 10 (n = 3), and more than 10 (n = 2). Each lesion was smaller than 2 cm; only one was 4 cm in diameter. The distribution of the lesion was subcapsular in 14 patients and central in five. Diffuse dissemination was observed in one. Eosinophil-associated abnormality was not present in other abdominal organ in all cases. The peripheral eosinophil count correlated closely with the number but not with the size of lesions. Sixteen patients who had follow-up images showed complete (n = 14) or partial regression of the lesions with a decrease in size (n = 1) or number (n = 1) after 2-22 months (mean, 6.4 months). CONCLUSION: Focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver had somewhat characteristic radiologic findings on sonography and CT. In the correct clinical context of peripheral eosinophilia and self-limited course, these radiologic findings may be helpful in differentiating this condition from other focal hepatic lesions.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the radiologic findings and clinical course of focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomographic (CT) and sonographic scans in 20 patients (18 male, two female; mean age, 50 years) with pathologically or clinically proven focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver by two experienced radiologists in our institute from August 1995 to June 1999. We also correlated radiologic findings with peripheral eosinophil count. Radiologic and clinical findings during the follow-up (range, 2-49 months; mean, 19.5 months) also were analyzed. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms and signs included abdominal pain (n = 4), easy fatigability (n = 3), weight loss (n = 1), and peripheral eosinophilia (n = 19). Twelve patients were asymptomatic. On sonographic examinations, all lesions were seen as focal, low echoic nodules. On CT, the lesions appeared isoattenuated or low attenuated in the arterial phase and low attenuated in the portal phase, except one case that showed high attenuation in the arterial phase. The margins of most lesions appeared poorly defined. Lesions were single (n = 9) and multiple: two to five (n = 6), six to 10 (n = 3), and more than 10 (n = 2). Each lesion was smaller than 2 cm; only one was 4 cm in diameter. The distribution of the lesion was subcapsular in 14 patients and central in five. Diffuse dissemination was observed in one. Eosinophil-associated abnormality was not present in other abdominal organ in all cases. The peripheral eosinophil count correlated closely with the number but not with the size of lesions. Sixteen patients who had follow-up images showed complete (n = 14) or partial regression of the lesions with a decrease in size (n = 1) or number (n = 1) after 2-22 months (mean, 6.4 months). CONCLUSION: Focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver had somewhat characteristic radiologic findings on sonography and CT. In the correct clinical context of peripheral eosinophilia and self-limited course, these radiologic findings may be helpful in differentiating this condition from other focal hepatic lesions.