Literature DB >> 12719221

Profiling charge complementarity and selectivity for binding at the protein surface.

Traian Sulea1, Enrico O Purisima.   

Abstract

A novel analysis and representation of the protein surface in terms of electrostatic binding complementarity and selectivity is presented. The charge optimization methodology is applied in a probe-based approach that simulates the binding process to the target protein. The molecular surface is color coded according to calculated optimal charge or according to charge selectivity, i.e., the binding cost of deviating from the optimal charge. The optimal charge profile depends on both the protein shape and charge distribution whereas the charge selectivity profile depends only on protein shape. High selectivity is concentrated in well-shaped concave pockets, whereas solvent-exposed convex regions are not charge selective. This suggests the synergy of charge and shape selectivity hot spots toward molecular selection and recognition, as well as the asymmetry of charge selectivity at the binding interface of biomolecular systems. The charge complementarity and selectivity profiles map relevant electrostatic properties in a readily interpretable way and encode information that is quite different from that visualized in the standard electrostatic potential map of unbound proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719221      PMCID: PMC1302852          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70016-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  15 in total

1.  Barstar is electrostatically optimized for tight binding to barnase.

Authors:  L P Lee; B Tidor
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-01

2.  Distinct binding specificity of the multiple PDZ domains of INADL, a human protein with homology to INAD from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P Vaccaro; B Brannetti; L Montecchi-Palazzi; S Philipp; M Helmer Citterich; G Cesareni; L Dente
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons.

Authors:  A Nicholls; K A Sharp; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1991

Review 4.  MOPAC: a semiempirical molecular orbital program.

Authors:  J J Stewart
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains.

Authors:  Z Songyang; A S Fanning; C Fu; J Xu; S M Marfatia; A H Chishti; A Crompton; A C Chan; J M Anderson; L C Cantley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Electronic effects in the interaction of para-substituted benzamidines with trypsin: the involvement of the pi-electronic density at the central atom of the substituent in binding.

Authors:  M Mares-Guia; D L Nelson; E Rogana
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1977-03-30       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Interscaffolding additivity: binding of P1 variants of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor to four serine proteases.

Authors:  D Krowarsch; M Dadlez; O Buczek; I Krokoszynska; A O Smalas; J Otlewski
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Crystal structures of a complexed and peptide-free membrane protein-binding domain: molecular basis of peptide recognition by PDZ.

Authors:  D A Doyle; A Lee; J Lewis; E Kim; M Sheng; R MacKinnon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Selectivity and promiscuity of the first and second PDZ domains of PSD-95 and synapse-associated protein 102.

Authors:  Indra Adi Lim; Duane D Hall; Johannes W Hell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Episelection: novel Ki approximately nanomolar inhibitors of serine proteases selected by binding or chemistry on an enzyme surface.

Authors:  B A Katz; J Finer-Moore; R Mortezaei; D H Rich; R M Stroud
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  9 in total

1.  Specificity in molecular design: a physical framework for probing the determinants of binding specificity and promiscuity in a biological environment.

Authors:  Mala L Radhakrishnan; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Application of new multi-resolution methods for the comparison of biomolecular electrostatic properties in the absence of global structural similarity.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Chandrajit L Bajaj; Bongjune Kwon; Todd J Dolinsky; Jens E Nielsen; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  A "Reverse-Schur" Approach to Optimization With Linear PDE Constraints: Application to Biomolecule Analysis and Design.

Authors:  Jaydeep P Bardhan; Michael D Altman; B Tidor; Jacob K White
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Quantum mechanical studies of DNA and LNA.

Authors:  Troels Koch; Irene Shim; Morten Lindow; Henrik Ørum; Henrik G Bohr
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.486

5.  Charge Optimization Theory for Induced-Fit Ligands.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Michael K Gilson; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Rational approaches to improving selectivity in drug design.

Authors:  David J Huggins; Woody Sherman; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Electronic Structures of LNA Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Henrik G Bohr; Irene Shim; Cy Stein; Henrik Ørum; Henrik F Hansen; Troels Koch
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 8.886

8.  Electrostatic recognition in substrate binding to serine proteases.

Authors:  Birgit J Waldner; Johannes Kraml; Ursula Kahler; Alexander Spinn; Michael Schauperl; Maren Podewitz; Julian E Fuchs; Gabriele Cruciani; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.137

9.  Tetrapeptide Ac-HAEE-NH2 Protects α4β2 nAChR from Inhibition by Aβ.

Authors:  Evgeny P Barykin; Aleksandra I Garifulina; Anna P Tolstova; Anastasia A Anashkina; Alexei A Adzhubei; Yuri V Mezentsev; Irina V Shelukhina; Sergey A Kozin; Victor I Tsetlin; Alexander A Makarov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.