Literature DB >> 12719052

Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery: a double-blind, randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine.

Andrea Casati1, Roberta Santorsola, Giorgio Aldegheri, Flavio Ravasi, Guido Fanelli, Marco Berti, Gianfranco Fraschini, Giorgio Torri.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the onset time and duration of epidural anesthesia, and the quality of postoperative analgesia produced by levobupivacaine, racemic bupivacaine, and ropivacaine.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at a University Hospital. PATIENTS: 45 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, undergoing elective total hip replacement.
INTERVENTIONS: After standard intravenous midazolam premedication and infusion of 500 mL of Ringer's acetate solution, patients were randomly allocated to receive epidural block with 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 15), 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 15), or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 15). Postoperatively, after pinprick sensation recovered at T(t), a patient-controlled epidural infusion was provided with 0.125% levobupivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (baseline infusion rate 5 mL/hr; incremental bolus 2 mL, lockout time: 20 min). Intravenous ketoprofen was also available for rescue analgesia if required.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The onset time of sensory block was 31 +/- 16 minutes with levobupivacaine, 25 +/- 19 minutes with bupivacaine, and 30 +/- 24 minutes with ropivacaine (p = 0.98), after a median (range) volume of 15 (10-18) mL in Group Levobupivacaine, 14 (10-18) mL in Group Bupivacaine, and 15 (10-18) mL in Group Ropivacaine (p = 0.85). Six patients in the ropivacaine group (40%) showed an intraoperative Bromage score <2 as compared with only three patients of Group Levobupivacaine (20%) and no patient of Group Bupivacaine (p = 0.02). Recovery of pinprick sensation at T(t) occurred after 214 +/- 61 minutes with levobupivacaine, 213 +/- 53 minutes with bupivacaine, and 233 +/- 34 minutes with ropivacaine (p = 0.26). A similar degree of pain relief was observed in the three groups without differences in local anesthetic consumption and need for rescue analgesia. Motor blockade progressively resolved without differences among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine 0.5% produces an epidural block of similar onset, quality, and duration as the one produced by the same volume of 0.5% bupivacaine, with a motor block deeper than that produced by 0.5% ropivacaine. When prolonging the block for the first 12 hours after surgery with a patient-controlled epidural infusion, 0.125% levobupivacaine provides adequate pain relief after major orthopedic surgery, with similar recovery of motor function as compared with 0.125% bupivacaine and 0.2% ropivacaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719052     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00513-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide.

Authors:  Ban C H Tsui; Alese Wagner; Brendan Finucane
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Evaluation of the effects of ketamine on spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Hong Lin; Wen-Bo Yi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery.

Authors:  Eyup Horasanli; Mehmet Gamli; Yasar Pala; Mustafa Erol; Fazilet Sahin; Bayazit Dikmen
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Levobupivacaine for epidural anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in hip surgery: a multi-center efficacy and safety equivalence study with bupivacaine and ropivacaine.

Authors:  T Koch; A Fichtner; U Schwemmer; T Standl; T Volk; K Engelhard; M F Stevens; C Putzke; J Scholz; M Zenz; J Motsch; V Hempel; A Heinrichs; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  The Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine on the Autonomic Nervous System and Cardiac Arrhythmia Parameters in Inguinal Hernia Surgeries.

Authors:  Aynur Demir; Ayşe Günay Kaya; Bünyamin Yavuz; Çiğdem Ünal Kantekin; Hülya Başar
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  The effects of Different Concentrations and Equivalent Volumes of Levobupivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia.

Authors:  Dilek B Surav; Ayse Hanci; G Ulufer Sivrikaya; Metin Bektas; Leyla T Kilinc
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2011-04

Review 8.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Chantal A A Heppolette; Derek Brunnen; Sohail Bampoe; Peter M Odor
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  The efficacy of 0.75% levobupivacaine versus 0.75% ropivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Ashraf M Ghali
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

10.  Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Crina L Burlacu; Donal J Buggy
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.