Literature DB >> 12717809

Chromatographic competitive binding immunoassays: a comparison of the sequential and simultaneous injection methods.

Mary Anne Nelson1, Wanda S Reiter, David S Hage.   

Abstract

Two approaches for performing competitive binding immunoassays by HPLC and other flow-based systems are the simultaneous and sequential injection methods. Both these techniques make use of a column with a limited amount of antibody, onto which is injected a sample and a fixed amount of a labeled analyte analog. An indirect measure of the unlabeled analyte in the sample is then obtained by looking at the amount of analog in either the nonretained or retained peaks. In the simultaneous injection mode, the sample and labeled analog are applied at the same time to the column, while in the sequential mode the sample is injected first, followed by the analog. This results in a difference in the analytical characteristics of these two approaches. This study used chromatographic theory and previous data obtained for injections of human serum albumin (HSA) onto an anti-HSA antibody column to compare the response, detection limits, range, and sensitivity of these methods. Under equivalent conditions, it was found that the sequential method always provided the best lower limit of detection and sensitivity. However, the simultaneous mode had a broader dynamic range and higher upper limit of detection. From these observations, several guidelines were developed regarding the use and selection of such assays for new applications. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12717809     DOI: 10.1002/bmc.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr        ISSN: 0269-3879            Impact factor:   1.902


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of affinity chromatography: recent trends and developments.

Authors:  David S Hage; Jeanethe A Anguizola; Cong Bi; Rong Li; Ryan Matsuda; Efthimia Papastavros; Erika Pfaunmiller; John Vargas; Xiwei Zheng
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 2.  Immunoaffinity chromatography: an introduction to applications and recent developments.

Authors:  Annette C Moser; David S Hage
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Chromatographic immunoassays: strategies and recent developments in the analysis of drugs and biological agents.

Authors:  Ryan Matsuda; Elliott Rodriguez; Doddavenkatanna Suresh; David S Hage
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Analysis of free drug fractions using near-infrared fluorescent labels and an ultrafast immunoextraction/displacement assay.

Authors:  Corey M Ohnmacht; John E Schiel; David S Hage
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Analysis of biomolecular interactions using affinity microcolumns: a review.

Authors:  Xiwei Zheng; Zhao Li; Sandya Beeram; Maria Podariu; Ryan Matsuda; Erika L Pfaunmiller; Christopher J White; NaTasha Carter; David S Hage
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Use of protein G microcolumns in chromatographic immunoassays: A comparison of competitive binding formats.

Authors:  Erika L Pfaunmiller; Jeanethe A Anguizola; Mitchell L Milanuk; NaTasha Carter; David S Hage
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 7.  Kinetic studies of biological interactions by affinity chromatography.

Authors:  John E Schiel; David S Hage
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  Determination of Fucose Concentration in a Lectin-Based Displacement Microfluidic Assay.

Authors:  Per G Erlandsson; Eva Åström; Peter Påhlsson; Nathaniel D Robinson
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.926

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.