Literature DB >> 12717729

A unified model for the origin of DNA sequence-directed curvature.

Nicholas V Hud1, Janez Plavec.   

Abstract

The fine structure of the DNA double helix and a number of its physical properties depend upon nucleotide sequence. This includes minor groove width, the propensity to undergo the B-form to A-form transition, sequence-directed curvature, and cation localization. Despite the multitude of studies conducted on DNA, it is still difficult to appreciate how these fundamental properties are linked to each other at the level of nucleotide sequence. We demonstrate that several sequence-dependent properties of DNA can be attributed, at least in part, to the sequence-specific localization of cations in the major and minor grooves. We also show that effects of cation localization on DNA structure are easier to understand if we divide all DNA sequences into three principal groups: A-tracts, G-tracts, and generic DNA. The A-tract group of sequences has a peculiar helical structure (i.e., B*-form) with an unusually narrow minor groove and high base-pair propeller twist. Both experimental and theoretical studies have provided evidence that the B*-form helical structure of A-tracts requires cations to be localized in the minor groove. G-tracts, on the other hand, have a propensity to undergo the B-form to A-form transition with increasing ionic strength. This property of G-tracts is directly connected to the observation that cations are preferentially localized in the major groove of G-tract sequences. Generic DNA, which represents the vast majority of DNA sequences, has a more balanced occupation of the major and minor grooves by cations than A-tracts or G-tracts and is thereby stabilized in the canonical B-form helix. Thus, DNA secondary structure can be viewed as a tug of war between the major and minor grooves for cations, with A-tracts and G-tracts each having one groove that dominates the other for cation localization. Finally, the sequence-directed curvature caused by A-tracts and G-tracts can, in both cases, be explained by the cation-dependent mismatch of A-tract and G-tract helical structures with the canonical B-form helix of generic DNA (i.e., a cation-dependent junction model). Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12717729     DOI: 10.1002/bip.10364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  46 in total

1.  Understanding the molecular mechanism of sequence dependent tenofovir removal by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: differences in primer binding site versus polypurine tract.

Authors:  Pinar Iyidogan; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.970

2.  DNA A-tract bending in three dimensions: solving the dA4T4 vs. dT4A4 conundrum.

Authors:  Richard Stefl; Haihong Wu; Sapna Ravindranathan; Vladimír Sklenár; Juli Feigon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ion motions in molecular dynamics simulations on DNA.

Authors:  Sergei Y Ponomarev; Kelly M Thayer; David L Beveridge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The shape of the DNA minor groove directs binding by the DNA-bending protein Fis.

Authors:  Stefano Stella; Duilio Cascio; Reid C Johnson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Quantitative analysis of monovalent counterion binding to random-sequence, double-stranded DNA using the replacement ion method.

Authors:  Earle Stellwagen; Qian Dong; Nancy C Stellwagen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Monovalent cation binding by curved DNA molecules containing variable numbers of a-tracts.

Authors:  Yongjun Lu; Nancy C Stellwagen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Shape readout of AT-rich DNA by carbohydrates.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Meredith Newby Spano; Dev P Arya
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Understanding the paradoxical mechanical response of in-phase A-tracts at different force regimes.

Authors:  Alberto Marin-Gonzalez; Cesar L Pastrana; Rebeca Bocanegra; Alejandro Martín-González; J G Vilhena; Rubén Pérez; Borja Ibarra; Clara Aicart-Ramos; Fernando Moreno-Herrero
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Recognition of AT-rich DNA binding sites by the MogR repressor.

Authors:  Aimee Shen; Darren E Higgins; Daniel Panne
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.