INTRODUCTION: The rate of complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is about 10%, and early complications have been reported in 20% of patients considered unfit for surgery. AIM: To evaluate the early and long-term results of endoscopic intervention in relation to the anesthesiological risk for 87 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: All patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and were evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) criteria immediately before the operative procedure. Patients' ASA scores were as follows: 49.4%, ASA 2; 29.9%, ASA 3; and 20.7%, ASA 4. RESULTS: The severity of acute pancreatitis was positively related to the anesthesiological grade (p = 0.014). Six patients (6.9%) had complications related to the endoscopic procedure. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of biliopancreatic complications during the follow-up (23/84, 27.4%) and the ASA grade. The frequency of cholecystectomy was inversely related to the ASA grade (p = 0.003). Seven patients (8.3%) died during the follow-up period: multivariate analysis showed that the ASA grade (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-96.6; p = 0.001) and age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.037) were significantly related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective in patients at high anesthesiological risk with acute pancreatitis, and survival is significantly related to the ASA grade.
INTRODUCTION: The rate of complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is about 10%, and early complications have been reported in 20% of patients considered unfit for surgery. AIM: To evaluate the early and long-term results of endoscopic intervention in relation to the anesthesiological risk for 87 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: All patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and were evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) criteria immediately before the operative procedure. Patients' ASA scores were as follows: 49.4%, ASA 2; 29.9%, ASA 3; and 20.7%, ASA 4. RESULTS: The severity of acute pancreatitis was positively related to the anesthesiological grade (p = 0.014). Six patients (6.9%) had complications related to the endoscopic procedure. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of biliopancreatic complications during the follow-up (23/84, 27.4%) and the ASA grade. The frequency of cholecystectomy was inversely related to the ASA grade (p = 0.003). Seven patients (8.3%) died during the follow-up period: multivariate analysis showed that the ASA grade (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-96.6; p = 0.001) and age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.037) were significantly related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective in patients at high anesthesiological risk with acute pancreatitis, and survival is significantly related to the ASA grade.