Literature DB >> 12717225

Location of in-house organ procurement organization staff in level I trauma centers increases conversion of potential donors to actual donors.

Teresa J Shafer1, Kimberly D Davis, Samuel M Holtzman, Charles T Van Buren, Nicholas J Crafts, Roger Durand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Of 5810 acute care hospitals in the United States, only 3.9% (231) are Level 1 Trauma Centers (L1TCs). L1TCs have a significant number of potential organ donors (PODs). Placement of Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) staff, In House Coordinators (IHCs), directly within the L1TC to increase the number of families who consent to donate and to provide system management for the trauma center's donation program, was evaluated.
METHODS: Four OPO staff, IHCs, were placed in offices inside two L1TCs in Houston, Texas. The IHCs were responsible for development of a donation system, donor surveillance, management, and most importantly, family support.
RESULTS: Calendar year 2000 data on conversion of PODs to actual donors were compared between the L1TCs with IHCs (IHC-L1TC) (n=2) and trauma centers without IHCs (n=4) within the OPO's service area. IHC-L1TCs converted 44% more of the PODs to actual donors. Furthermore, the IHC-L1TCs were compared with 85 L1TCs (37% of U.S. L1TCs) without IHCs. IHC-L1TCs had a 28% greater donor consent rate and a 48% greater conversion rate of PODs to actual donors than the national L1TCs.
CONCLUSIONS: L1TC status is the America College of Surgeons' highest level of verification for trauma care. To be certified as a L1TC, hospitals must meet strict criteria in both services and patient care. The donation process is often profoundly affected by the burden of demands made on the resources of these institutions and from divergent responsibilities between specialty services within the facility. Dedicated IHCs (OPO staff) are needed to provide early family intervention and to orchestrate the donation process to maximize organ recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12717225     DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000060532.70301.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  7 in total

1.  Do trained specialists solicit familial authorization at equal frequency, regardless of deceased donor characteristics?

Authors:  Derek A Dubay; David T Redden; Akhlaque Haque; Stephen H Gray; Mona Fouad; Connie Kohler; Garry Taylor; Devin E Eckhoff
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.187

2.  Organ donation decision: comparison of donor and nondonor families.

Authors:  J R Rodrigue; D L Cornell; R J Howard
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Organ preservation in a brain dead patient: information support for neurocritical care protocol development.

Authors:  Pauline M Todd; Rebecca N Jerome; Adrian A Jarquin-Valdivia
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-07

4.  Attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent among next-of-kin who consented vs. refused organ donation.

Authors:  James R Rodrigue; Danielle L Cornell; Richard J Howard
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The instability of organ donation decisions by next-of-kin and factors that predict it.

Authors:  J R Rodrigue; D L Cornell; R J Howard
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  The development and current status of Intensive Care Unit management of prospective organ donors.

Authors:  Margaret Kathleen Menzel Ellis; Mitchell Brett Sally; Darren Malinoski
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  Clinical review: moral assumptions and the process of organ donation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Stephen Streat
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.