Literature DB >> 12716820

A model to determine workforce needs for endocrinologists in the United States until 2020.

Robert A Rizza1, Robert A Vigersky, Helena W Rodbard, Paul W Ladenson, William F Young, Martin I Surks, Richard Kahn, Paul F Hogan.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define the workforce needs for the specialty of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism in the United States between 1999 and 2020. An interactive model of factors likely to influence the balance between the supply and demand of endocrinologists during the next 20 years was constructed. The model used data from a wide range of sources and was developed under the guidance of a panel of experts derived from sponsoring organizations of endocrinologists. We determined current and projected numbers and demographics of endocrinologists in the U.S. workforce and the anticipated balance between supply and demand from 1999 to 2020. There were 3,623 adult endocrinologists in the workforce in 1999, of which 2,389 (66%) were in office-based practice. Their median age was 49 years. Both total office visits and services performed by endocrinologists (particularly for diabetes) increased substantially during the 1990s. Waiting time for an initial appointment is presently longer for endocrinologists than for other physicians. Compared with a balanced, largely closed-staff health maintenance organization, the current national supply of endocrinologists is estimated to be 12% lower than demand. The number of endocrinologists entering the market has continuously fallen over the previous 5 years, from 200 in 1995 to 171 in 1999. Even if this downward trend were abruptly stopped, the model predicts that demand will exceed supply from now until 2020. While this gap narrows from 2000 to 2008 due to projected growth of managed care, it widens thereafter due to the aging of both the population and the endocrine workforce. Inclusion of other factors such as projected real income growth and increased prevalence of age-related endocrine disorders (e.g., diabetes and osteoporosis) further accentuates the deficit. If the number of endocrinologists entering the workforce remains at 1999 levels, demand will continue to exceed supply from now through 2020 for adult endocrinologists, and the gap will widen progressively from 2010 onward. The present analysis indicates that the number of endocrinologists entering the workforce will not be sufficient to meet future demand. These data suggest that steps should be taken to stop the ongoing decline in the number of endocrinologists in training and consideration should be given to actions designed to increase the number of endocrinologists in practice in the years ahead.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12716820     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  10 in total

1.  Primary Care Providers in California and Florida Report Low Confidence in Providing Type 1 Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Rayhan A Lal; Nicolas Cuttriss; Michael J Haller; Katarina Yabut; Claudia Anez-Zabala; Korey K Hood; Eleni Sheehan; Marina Basina; Angelina Bernier; Linda G Baer; Stephanie L Filipp; C Jason Wang; Marissa A Town; Matthew J Gurka; David M Maahs; Ashby F Walker
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-04

2.  Improved glycemic control in intensively treated adult subjects with type 1 diabetes using insulin guidance software.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Tevin R Bookout; Kim K McFann; William C Kelly; Christie Beatson; Samuel L Ellis; Raymond S Gutin; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Insulin Delivery Hardware: Pumps and Pens.

Authors:  Rayhan Lal; Lalantha Leelarathna
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 7.337

4.  Sponsorship of internal medicine subspecialty fellowships since 2000: trends and community hospital involvement.

Authors:  Robert Ferguson; Fernanda Porto Carreiro; Lyn Camire
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2009-07-14

5.  The Neighborhood Deprivation Index and Provider Geocoding Identify Critical Catchment Areas for Diabetes Outreach.

Authors:  Ashby F Walker; Hui Hu; Nicolas Cuttriss; Claudia Anez-Zabala; Katarina Yabut; Michael J Haller; David M Maahs
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Relational coordination amongst health professionals involved in insulin initiation for people with type 2 diabetes in general practice: an exploratory survey.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis; Irene Blackberry; Doris Young; David O'Neal; Elizabeth Patterson; John Furler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Translating U-500R Randomized Clinical Trial Evidence to the Practice Setting: A Diabetes Educator/Expert Prescriber Team Approach.

Authors:  Paula M Bergen; Davida F Kruger; April D Taylor; Wael E Eid; Arti Bhan; Jeffrey A Jackson
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.140

9.  A work force model to support the adoption of best practice care in chronic diseases - a missing piece in clinical guideline implementation.

Authors:  Leonie Segal; Kim Dalziel; Tom Bolton
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Population-based geographic access to endocrinologists in the United States, 2012.

Authors:  Hua Lu; James B Holt; Yiling J Cheng; Xingyou Zhang; Stephen Onufrak; Janet B Croft
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.