Literature DB >> 12716803

Differences in LDL oxidizability by glycemic status: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study.

Dawn C Schwenke1, Ralph B D'Agostino, David C Goff, Andrew J Karter, Marian J Rewers, Lynne E Wagenknecht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in LDL oxidizability by glycemic status within the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LDL oxidizability (lag time and oxidation rate) after exposure to copper was compared among 352 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and known type 2 diabetes.
RESULTS: After adjustment for age, clinic, ethnicity, sex, and smoking status, LDL oxidation rates differed by glycemic status (P = 0.001), with a strong trend (P = 0.0001) for reduced LDL oxidation rate with increasing extent and duration of glucose intolerance (2,378 +/- 54, 2,208 +/- 65, 2,145 +/- 71, and 2,115 +/- 48 arbitrary units [mean +/- SE] for NGT, IGT, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and known type 2 diabetes, respectively). Differences in LDL oxidation rate among groups were relatively unaltered by adjustment for lipids and lipoproteins, hypertension, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and remained significant even after further adjustment for dietary antioxidants and fatty acids, as well as medications. LDL lag times differed marginally by glycemic status (P = 0.058), with similar values for NGT, IGT, and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (57-60 min) but higher values for known type 2 diabetes (65 +/- 2). These differences were eliminated by further adjustment for lipids and lipoproteins, hypertension, BMI, and WHR.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that glycemic status influenced LDL oxidizability, with a paradoxical reduction in LDL oxidizability, as indicated by a lower LDL oxidation rate with increased extent and duration of glucose intolerance. This difference was only slightly attenuated by adjustment for relevant demographic, metabolic, dietary, and pharmacological factors that potentially influence LDL oxidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12716803     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of the physicochemical properties of LDL in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P G Scheffer; T Teerlink; R J Heine
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Oxidized LDL and Fructosamine Associated with Severity of Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis in Insulin Resistant Pigs Fed a High Fat/High NaCl Diet.

Authors:  Timothy C Nichols; Elizabeth P Merricks; Dwight A Bellinger; Robin A Raymer; Jing Yu; Diana Lam; Gary G Koch; Walker H Busby; David R Clemmons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Oxidized low density lipoprotein and total antioxidant capacity in type-2 diabetic and impaired glucose tolerance Saudi men.

Authors:  Essam Eldin Mohamed Nour Eldin; Abdullah Almarzouki; Adel Mohamed Assiri; Osman Mohammed Elsheikh; Badreldin Elsonni Abdalla Mohamed; Abdullatif Taha Babakr
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.320

4.  Increased serum oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Azam Ghaneei; Sara Yassini; Mohammad Ebrahim Ghanei; Ahmad Shojaoddiny-Ardekani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.