Literature DB >> 12716676

Erythrocyte protoporphyrin or hemoglobin: which is a better screening test for iron deficiency in children and women?

Zuguo Mei1, Ibrahim Parvanta, Mary E Cogswell, Elaine W Gunter, Laurence M Grummer-Strawn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin and erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) tests are commonly used to screen for iron deficiency. However, little research has been done to systematically evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these 2 tests.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of hemoglobin and EP measurements in predicting iron deficiency in preschool children and in women of childbearing age.
DESIGN: We examined data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 2613 children aged 1-5 y and n = 5175 nonpregnant women aged 15-49 y). Children or women with blood lead >or= 10 microg/dL were excluded from this study. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of hemoglobin and EP measurements in screening for iron deficiency, defined as having abnormal values for >or= 2 of the following 3 indexes: mean cell volume, transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin.
RESULTS: The ROC performance of EP was consistently better than that of hemoglobin for detecting iron deficiency in preschool children. However, in nonpregnant women, we found no significant difference between EP and hemoglobin in ROC performance for detecting iron deficiency. We observed the same results when we stratified the analyses by sex and race of the children and by race of the women.
CONCLUSIONS: For children aged 1-5 y, EP is a better screening tool for iron deficiency than is hemoglobin. However, for nonpregnant women, EP and hemoglobin have similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting iron deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12716676     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  6 in total

1.  Iron status of inner-city African-American infants.

Authors:  Betsy Lozoff; Mary Lu Angelilli; Jigna Zatakia; Sandra W Jacobson; Agustin Calatroni; John Beard
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Trends in childhood anemia in a Massachusetts Health Maintenance Organization, 1987-2001.

Authors:  Emily Oken; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Ken P Kleinman; Kelley S Scanlon; Janet W Rich-Edwards
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-09-07

3.  Effectiveness of zinc protoporphyrin/heme ratio for screening iron deficiency in preschool-aged children.

Authors:  Kyeong Hee Yu
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Use of the Electronic Health Record to Assess Prevalence of Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Andrea J Sharma; Nicole D Ford; Joanna E Bulkley; Lindsay M Jenkins; Kimberly K Vesco; Anne M Williams
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.687

5.  Diagnostic utility of zinc protoporphyrin to detect iron deficiency in Kenyan pregnant women.

Authors:  Martin N Mwangi; Sumi Maskey; Pauline E A Andang o; Noel K Shinali; Johanna M Roth; Laura Trijsburg; Alice M Mwangi; Han Zuilhof; Barend van Lagen; Huub Fj Savelkoul; Ayşe Y Demir; Hans Verhoef
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Is Erythrocyte Protoporphyrin a Better Single Screening Test for Iron Deficiency Compared to Hemoglobin or Mean Cell Volume in Children and Women?

Authors:  Zuguo Mei; Rafael C Flores-Ayala; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Gary M Brittenham
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.