| Literature DB >> 12716231 |
A. Serda Kantarcioglu1, Ayhan Yücel.
Abstract
The newly described species Candida dubliniensis phenotipically resembles Candida albicans in many respects and so it could be easily misidentified. The present study aimed at determining the frequency at which this new Candida species was not recognized in the authors' university hospital clinical laboratory and to assess antifungal susceptibility. In this study, six identification methods based on significant phenotypic characteristics each proposed as reliable tests applicable in mycology laboratories for the differentiation of the two species were performed together to assess the clinical strains that were initially identified as C. albicans. Only the isolates which have had the parallel results in all methods were assessed as C. dubliniensis. One hundred and twenty-nine C. albicans strains isolated from deep mycosis suspected patients were further examined. Three of 129 C. albicans (2 from oral cavity, 1 from sputum) were reidentified as C. dubliniensis. One of the strains isolated from oral cavity and that from the sputum were obtained at two months intervals from the same patient with acute myeloid leukemia, while the other oral cavity strain was obtained from a patient who had previously been irradiated for a laryngeal malignancy. Isolates were all susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B, with the MIC range 0.125 to 0.5 &mgr;g/ml, resistant to fluconazole, with MICs >/=64 &mgr;g/ml, and resistant to ketoconazole, with MICs >/=16 &mgr;g/ml, dose-dependent to itraconazole with a MIC range 0.25-0.5 &mgr;g/ml, and susceptible to flucytosine, with a MIC range 1-4 &mgr;g/ml.Entities:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12716231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Iberoam Micol ISSN: 1130-1406 Impact factor: 1.044