Literature DB >> 12715092

Penetration of mixed micelles into the epidermis: effect of mixing sodium dodecyl sulfate with dodecyl hexa(ethylene oxide).

Peter N Moore1, Anat Shiloach, Sudhakar Puvvada, Daniel Blankschtein.   

Abstract

The penetration of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) into the epidermis from contacting solutions of SDS and the nonionic surfactant dodecyl hexa(ethylene oxide) (C(12)E(6)) was measured for three SDS concentrations (25 mM, 50 mM, and 100 mM) and three SDS solution compositions (1, 0.83, and 0.50). The addition of C(12)E(6) to the SDS solutions was found to decrease the amount of SDS penetrating into the epidermis. The observed decrease occurred via two plausible mechanisms: (i) the addition of C(12)E(6) decreased the SDS monomer concentration, thus reducing the driving force for the penetration of monomeric SDS into the epidermis, and (ii) the addition of C(12)E(6) reduced, or prevented, the penetration of micellar SDS into the epidermis. Using dynamic light scattering, the hydrodynamic radii of the SDS/C(12)E(6) micelles were determined to be 20 A, for the alpha(m) = 1 micelles, 24 A for the alpha(m) = 0.83 micelles, and 27 A for the alpha(m) = 0.50 micelles (where alpha(m) denotes the SDS micelle composition). A comparison with typical stratum corneum aqueous pore radii reported in the literature (10-28 A) suggests that the alpha(m) = 1 (pure SDS) micelles are able to penetrate into the epidermis, while the alpha(m) = 0.83 and the alpha(m) = 0.50 SDS/C(12)E(6) mixed micelles are sterically hindered from doing so due to their larger sizes. The observed reduced penetration of SDS into the epidermis upon the addition of C(12)E(6) could lead to a reduction in the skin irritation potential of SDS, provided that there is a relationship between the concentration of SDS in the epidermis and the skin irritation induced by SDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12715092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cosmet Sci        ISSN: 1525-7886            Impact factor:   0.948


  5 in total

Review 1.  Topical vaccination: the skin as a unique portal to adaptive immune responses.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Huang
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.623

2.  Imaging the distribution of sodium dodecyl sulfate in skin by confocal Raman and infrared microspectroscopy.

Authors:  G Mao; C R Flach; R Mendelsohn; R M Walters
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effect of surfactant mixtures on skin structure and barrier properties.

Authors:  Monica A James-Smith; Brittney Hellner; Nancy Annunziato; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Cleansing formulations that respect skin barrier integrity.

Authors:  Russel M Walters; Guangru Mao; Euen T Gunn; Sidney Hornby
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-13

5.  Hydrophobically modified polymers can minimize skin irritation potential caused by surfactant-based cleansers.

Authors:  Zoe Draelos; Sidney Hornby; Russel M Walters; Yohini Appa
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.696

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.