Literature DB >> 12714861

The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial.

Hans Lithell1, Lennart Hansson, Ingmar Skoog, Dag Elmfeldt, Albert Hofman, Bertil Olofsson, Peter Trenkwalder, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic benefits of blood pressure lowering treatment in elderly hypertensive patients were established more than a decade ago, but are less clear in those with mildly to moderately elevated blood pressure.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients with mildly to moderately elevated blood pressure confers a reduction in cardiovascular events, cognitive decline and dementia.
DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study conducted in 1997-2002. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was of 4964 patients aged 70-89 years, with systolic blood pressure 160-179 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mmHg, and a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test score >or= 24. A total of 527 centres in 15 countries participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned randomly to receive the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan or placebo, with open-label active antihypertensive therapy added as needed. As a consequence, active antihypertensive therapy was extensively used in the control group (84% of patients). Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was major cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcome measures included cardiovascular death, non-fatal and fatal stroke and myocardial infarction, cognitive function measured by the MMSE and dementia.
RESULTS: Blood pressure fell by 21.7/10.8 mmHg in the candesartan group and by 18.5/9.2 mmHg in the control group. A first major cardiovascular event occurred in 242 candesartan patients and in 268 control patients; risk reduction with candesartan was 10.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.0 to 25.1, P = 0.19]. Candesartan-based treatment reduced non-fatal stroke by 27.8% (95% CI, 1.3 to 47.2, P = 0.04), and all stroke by 23.6% (95% CI, -0.7 to 42.1, P = 0.056). There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. Mean MMSE score fell from 28.5 to 28.0 in the candesartan group and from 28.5 to 27.9 in the control group (P = 0.20). The proportions of patients who had a significant cognitive decline or developed dementia were not different in the two treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly hypertensive patients, a slightly more effective blood pressure reduction during candesartan-based therapy, compared with control therapy, was associated with a modest, statistically non-significant, reduction in major cardiovascular events and with a marked reduction in non-fatal stroke. Cognitive function was well maintained in both treatment groups in the presence of substantial blood pressure reductions. Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12714861     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  300 in total

Review 1.  Mild cognitive impairment and dementia: the importance of modifiable risk factors.

Authors:  Thorleif Etgen; Dirk Sander; Horst Bickel; Hans Förstl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Protection against stroke and dementia: an update on the latest clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Bryan Williams
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  [Arterial hypertension and dementia].

Authors:  R Scheid; H Voigt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Local renin-angiotensin systems in the genitourinary tract.

Authors:  Craig Comiter
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  [Analysis of the rational use of anti-hypertensives in the Murcia (Spain) region].

Authors:  Juan C Ruiz; María A Ariza; Belén Aguilera; Mariano Leal; Ramón Gómez; José Abellán
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 7.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Navigating the gray zones of stroke management for a graying population.

Authors:  Meng Lee; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 9.  Vascular risk factors and dementia: how to move forward?

Authors:  Anand Viswanathan; Walter A Rocca; Christophe Tzourio
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Olmesartan vs. ramipril in elderly hypertensive patients: review of data from two published randomized, double-blind studies.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ettore Malacco; Jean-Michel Mallion; Paolo Fabrizzi; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2014-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.